These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35819795)

  • 41. Failure of total knee arthroplasty with or without patella resurfacing.
    Lygre SH; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Vollset SE; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2011 Jun; 82(3):282-92. PubMed ID: 21619502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effect of polyethylene thickness on revision rates of contemporary cruciate retaining knee replacements. A registry analysis.
    Khan M; Inglis M; Samson A; Lewis PL; Peng Y; Wilson CJ
    Knee; 2021 Dec; 33():243-251. PubMed ID: 34739955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. International comparative evaluation of knee replacement with fixed or mobile non-posterior-stabilized implants.
    Namba R; Graves S; Robertsson O; Furnes O; Stea S; Puig-Verdié L; Hoeffel D; Cafri G; Paxton E; Sedrakyan A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Dec; 96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):52-8. PubMed ID: 25520419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Impact of Image-Derived Instrumentation on Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Rates: An Analysis of 83,823 Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    McAuliffe MJ; Beer BR; Hatch JJ; Crawford RW; Cuthbert AR; Donnelly WJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Apr; 101(7):580-588. PubMed ID: 30946191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Advantage of minimal anterior knee pain and long-term survivorship of cemented single radius posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing.
    Ji HM; Ha YC; Baek JH; Ko YB
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2015 Mar; 7(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 25729519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.
    Limberg AK; Tibbo ME; Pagnano MW; Perry KI; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):458-462. PubMed ID: 32228079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis.
    Hwang SC; Kong JY; Nam DC; Kim DH; Park HB; Jeong ST; Cho SH
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2010 Jun; 2(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 20514269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. No Difference in Revision Rate Between Low Viscosity and High Viscosity Cement Used in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Klasan A; Rainbird S; Peng Y; Holder C; Parkinson B; Young SW; Lewis PL
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Oct; 37(10):2025-2034. PubMed ID: 35525417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Have the Causes of Revision for Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties Changed During the Past Two Decades?
    Dyrhovden GS; Lygre SHL; Badawy M; Gøthesen Ø; Furnes O
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jul; 475(7):1874-1886. PubMed ID: 28299718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different knee prostheses: the Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT).
    Murray DW; MacLennan GS; Breeman S; Dakin HA; Johnston L; Campbell MK; Gray AM; Fiddian N; Fitzpatrick R; Morris RW; Grant AM;
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Mar; 18(19):1-235, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 24679222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Higher mid-term revision rates of posterior stabilized compared with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties: 133,841 cemented arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007-2016.
    Spekenbrink-Spooren A; Van Steenbergen LN; Denissen GAW; Swierstra BA; Poolman RW; Nelissen RGHH
    Acta Orthop; 2018 Dec; 89(6):640-645. PubMed ID: 30350747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. A follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Julin J; Jämsen E; Puolakka T; Konttinen YT; Moilanen T
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Aug; 81(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 20809740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. RSA-tested TKA Implants on Average Have Lower Mean 10-year Revision Rates Than Non-RSA-tested Designs.
    Hasan S; Marang-van de Mheen PJ; Kaptein BL; Nelissen RGHH; Pijls BG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1232-1241. PubMed ID: 32187101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Unexpected high rate of revision of a modern cemented fixed bearing modular posterior-stabilized knee arthroplasty.
    Lachiewicz PF; Steele JR; Wellman SS
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):137-144. PubMed ID: 34053294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Conventional Versus Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Primary Total Knee Replacement: A Comparison of Revision Rates Using Data from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
    Partridge TCJ; Baker PN; Jameson SS; Mason J; Reed MR; Deehan DJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Jan; 102(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 31725123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Ten-year clinical and radiographic results of 1000 cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacements.
    Mohammad HR; Kennedy JA; Mellon SJ; Judge A; Dodd CA; Murray DW
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 May; 28(5):1479-1487. PubMed ID: 31209540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Short-term Revision Risk of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty Is High: An Analysis from Eight Large Arthroplasty Registries.
    Lewis PL; Tudor F; Lorimer M; McKie J; Bohm E; Robertsson O; Makela KT; Haapakoski J; Furnes O; Bartz-Johannessen C; Nelissen RGHH; Van Steenbergen LN; Fithian DC; Prentice HA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1222-1231. PubMed ID: 32348089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Is there a difference in total knee arthroplasty risk of revision in highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene?
    Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Kurtz S; Love R; Cafri G; Namba RS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Mar; 473(3):999-1008. PubMed ID: 25567357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Increased risk of aseptic loosening for 43,525 rotating-platform vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements.
    Gothesen O; Lygre SHL; Lorimer M; Graves S; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Dec; 88(6):649-656. PubMed ID: 28929828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Biconvex Patellar Components: 96% Durability at 10 Years in 262 Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties.
    Hines JT; Lewallen DG; Perry KI; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Jul; 103(13):1220-1228. PubMed ID: 33760782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.