119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35820062)
21. Time structure of pencil beam scanning proton FLASH beams measured with scintillator detectors and compared with log files.
Kanouta E; Johansen JG; Kertzscher G; Sitarz MK; Sørensen BS; Poulsen PR
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1932-1943. PubMed ID: 35076947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Proton therapy delivery method affects dose-averaged linear energy transfer in patients.
Wilson LJ; Pirlepesov F; Moskvin V; Li Z; Guo Y; Li Y; Merchant TE; Faught AM
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Apr; 66(7):. PubMed ID: 33607632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Technical Note: Plan-delivery-time constrained inverse optimization method with minimum-MU-per-energy-layer (MMPEL) for efficient pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Gao H; Clasie B; McDonald M; Langen KM; Liu T; Lin Y
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3892-3897. PubMed ID: 32614472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A new treatment planning approach accounting for prompt gamma range verification and interfractional anatomical changes.
Tian L; Landry G; Dedes G; Pinto M; Kamp F; Belka C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Apr; 65(9):095005. PubMed ID: 32135530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Proton Treatment Techniques for Posterior Fossa Tumors: Consequences for Linear Energy Transfer and Dose-Volume Parameters for the Brainstem and Organs at Risk.
Giantsoudi D; Adams J; MacDonald SM; Paganetti H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Feb; 97(2):401-410. PubMed ID: 27986346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. NTCP Modeling for High-Grade Temporal Radionecroses in a Large Cohort of Patients Receiving Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Skull Base and Head and Neck Tumors.
Schröder C; Köthe A; De Angelis C; Basler L; Fattori G; Safai S; Leiser D; Lomax AJ; Weber DC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2022 Jun; 113(2):448-455. PubMed ID: 35124132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pencil beam scanning proton therapy for the treatment of craniopharyngioma complicated with radiation-induced cerebral vasculopathies: A dosimetric and linear energy transfer (LET) evaluation.
Bolsi A; Placidi L; Pica A; Ahlhelm FJ; Walser M; Lomax AJ; Weber DC
Radiother Oncol; 2020 Aug; 149():197-204. PubMed ID: 32387488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Can the mean linear energy transfer of organs be directly related to patient toxicities for current head and neck cancer intensity-modulated proton therapy practice?
Wagenaar D; Schuit E; van der Schaaf A; Langendijk JA; Both S
Radiother Oncol; 2021 Dec; 165():159-165. PubMed ID: 34534614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Osteoradionecrosis of the mandible after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: risk factors and dose-volume correlations.
Aarup-Kristensen S; Hansen CR; Forner L; Brink C; Eriksen JG; Johansen J
Acta Oncol; 2019 Oct; 58(10):1373-1377. PubMed ID: 31364903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Toward a new treatment planning approach accounting for in vivo proton range verification.
Tian L; Landry G; Dedes G; Kamp F; Pinto M; Niepel K; Belka C; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215025. PubMed ID: 30375361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative analysis of dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET
Rana S; Traneus E; Jackson M; Tran L; Rosenfeld AB
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3444-3456. PubMed ID: 35194809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Monte Carlo based radiation response modelling framework to assess variability of clinical RBE in proton therapy.
Eulitz J; Lutz B; Wohlfahrt P; Dutz A; Enghardt W; Karpowitz C; Krause M; Troost EGC; Lühr A
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Nov; 64(22):225020. PubMed ID: 31374558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Investigating CT to CBCT image registration for head and neck proton therapy as a tool for daily dose recalculation.
Landry G; Nijhuis R; Dedes G; Handrack J; Thieke C; Janssens G; Orban de Xivry J; Reiner M; Kamp F; Wilkens JJ; Paganelli C; Riboldi M; Baroni G; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Parodi K
Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1354-66. PubMed ID: 25735290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Classification of the source of treatment deviation in proton therapy using prompt-gamma imaging information.
Khamfongkhruea C; Berthold J; Janssens G; Petzoldt J; Smeets J; Pausch G; Richter C
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5102-5111. PubMed ID: 32678913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A framework for defining FLASH dose rate for pencil beam scanning.
Folkerts MM; Abel E; Busold S; Perez JR; Krishnamurthi V; Ling CC
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6396-6404. PubMed ID: 32910460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Towards FLASH proton therapy: the impact of treatment planning and machine characteristics on achievable dose rates.
van de Water S; Safai S; Schippers JM; Weber DC; Lomax AJ
Acta Oncol; 2019 Oct; 58(10):1463-1469. PubMed ID: 31241377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional LET calculations for treatment planning of proton therapy.
Wilkens JJ; Oelfke U
Z Med Phys; 2004; 14(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 15104009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intensity-modulated proton therapy and osteoradionecrosis in oropharyngeal cancer.
Zhang W; Zhang X; Yang P; Blanchard P; Garden AS; Gunn B; Fuller CD; Chambers M; Hutcheson KA; Ye R; Lai SY; Radwan MAS; Zhu XR; Frank SJ
Radiother Oncol; 2017 Jun; 123(3):401-405. PubMed ID: 28549794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Initial Report of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Posthysterectomy Patients With Gynecologic Cancer.
Lin LL; Kirk M; Scholey J; Taku N; Kiely JB; White B; Both S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):181-189. PubMed ID: 26372435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impact of range uncertainty on clinical distributions of linear energy transfer and biological effectiveness in proton therapy.
Hahn C; Eulitz J; Peters N; Wohlfahrt P; Enghardt W; Richter C; Lühr A
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6151-6162. PubMed ID: 33118161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
