These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35820886)

  • 1. A review of reproducible and transparent research practices in urology publications from 2014 to2018.
    Rauh S; Johnson BS; Bowers A; Tritz D; Vassar BM
    BMC Urol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):102. PubMed ID: 35820886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducible and transparent research practices in published neurology research.
    Rauh S; Torgerson T; Johnson AL; Pollard J; Tritz D; Vassar M
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2020; 5():5. PubMed ID: 32161667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating Reproducibility and Transparency in Emergency Medicine Publications.
    Johnson BS; Rauh S; Tritz D; Schiesel M; Vassar M
    West J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 22(4):963-971. PubMed ID: 35353995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analysis of key indicators of reproducibility in radiology.
    Wright BD; Vo N; Nolan J; Johnson AL; Braaten T; Tritz D; Vassar M
    Insights Imaging; 2020 May; 11(1):65. PubMed ID: 32394098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of transparent and reproducible research practices in the psychiatry literature.
    Sherry CE; Pollard JZ; Tritz D; Carr BK; Pierce A; Vassar M
    Gen Psychiatr; 2020; 33(1):e100149. PubMed ID: 32175523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of reproducible and transparent research practices in pulmonology.
    Smith CA; Nolan J; Tritz DJ; Heavener TE; Pelton J; Cook K; Vassar M
    Pulmonology; 2021; 27(2):134-143. PubMed ID: 32739326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the reproducibility of research in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Rauh S; Bowers A; Rorah D; Tritz D; Pate H; Frye L; Vassar M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Feb; 269():24-29. PubMed ID: 34954422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Evaluation of Nephrology Literature for Transparency and Reproducibility Indicators: Cross-Sectional Review.
    Fladie IA; Adewumi TM; Vo NH; Tritz DJ; Vassar MB
    Kidney Int Rep; 2020 Feb; 5(2):173-181. PubMed ID: 32043031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducible Research Practices in the Plastic Surgery Literature.
    Ascha M; Katabi L; Stevens E; Gatherwright J; Vassar M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Apr; 149(4):810e-823e. PubMed ID: 35196293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do oncology researchers adhere to reproducible and transparent principles? A cross-sectional survey of published oncology literature.
    Walters C; Harter ZJ; Wayant C; Vo N; Warren M; Chronister J; Tritz D; Vassar M
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e033962. PubMed ID: 31892667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015-2017.
    Wallach JD; Boyack KW; Ioannidis JPA
    PLoS Biol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):e2006930. PubMed ID: 30457984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of the practice of transparency and reproducibility in addiction medicine literature.
    Adewumi MT; Vo N; Tritz D; Beaman J; Vassar M
    Addict Behav; 2021 Jan; 112():106560. PubMed ID: 32763621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in otolaryngology.
    Johnson AL; Torgerson T; Skinner M; Hamilton T; Tritz D; Vassar M
    Laryngoscope; 2020 Aug; 130(8):1894-1901. PubMed ID: 31593300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transparent and Reproducible Research Practices in the Surgical Literature.
    Hughes BT; Niemann A; Tritz D; Boyer K; Robbins H; Vassar M
    J Surg Res; 2022 Jun; 274():116-124. PubMed ID: 35150944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predatory publishing or a lack of peer review transparency?-a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in paediatric urology.
    O'Kelly F; Fernandez N; Koyle MA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Apr; 15(2):159.e1-159.e7. PubMed ID: 30867116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of practices to promote reproducibility and transparency in anaesthesiology research.
    Okonya O; Rorah D; Tritz D; Umberham B; Wiley M; Vassar M
    Br J Anaesth; 2020 Nov; 125(5):835-842. PubMed ID: 32611528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature.
    Iqbal SA; Wallach JD; Khoury MJ; Schully SD; Ioannidis JP
    PLoS Biol; 2016 Jan; 14(1):e1002333. PubMed ID: 26726926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bibliometric Analysis of Erectile Dysfunction Publications in Urology and Sexual Medicine Journals.
    Rezaee ME; Johnson HA; Munarriz RM; Gross MS
    J Sex Med; 2018 Oct; 15(10):1426-1433. PubMed ID: 30219665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of indicators supporting reproducibility and transparency within cardiology literature.
    Anderson JM; Wright B; Rauh S; Tritz D; Horn J; Parker I; Bergeron D; Cook S; Vassar M
    Heart; 2021 Jan; 107(2):120-126. PubMed ID: 32826286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.