182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35821562)
1. Comparison of rhinomanometric and computational fluid dynamic assessment of nasal resistance with respect to measurement accuracy.
Schmidt N; Behrbohm H; Goubergrits L; Hildebrandt T; Brüning J
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2022 Sep; 17(9):1519-1529. PubMed ID: 35821562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rhinomanometry Versus Computational Fluid Dynamics: Correlated, but Different Techniques.
Cherobin GB; Voegels RL; Pinna FR; Gebrim EMMS; Bailey RS; Garcia GJM
Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2021 Mar; 35(2):245-255. PubMed ID: 32806938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Agreement between rhinomanometry and computed tomography-based computational fluid dynamics.
Berger M; Giotakis AI; Pillei M; Mehrle A; Kraxner M; Kral F; Recheis W; Riechelmann H; Freysinger W
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2021 Apr; 16(4):629-638. PubMed ID: 33677758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 4-Phase-Rhinomanometry (4PR)--basics and practice 2010.
Vogt K; Jalowayski AA; Althaus W; Cao C; Han D; Hasse W; Hoffrichter H; Mösges R; Pallanch J; Shah-Hosseini K; Peksis K; Wernecke KD; Zhang L; Zaporoshenko P
Rhinol Suppl; 2010; 21():1-50. PubMed ID: 20649107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlations between computational fluid dynamics and clinical evaluation of nasal airway obstruction due to septal deviation: An observational study.
Radulesco T; Meister L; Bouchet G; Varoquaux A; Giordano J; Mancini J; Dessi P; Perrier P; Michel J
Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Jul; 44(4):603-611. PubMed ID: 31004557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computational Fluid Dynamics in the assessment of nasal obstruction in children.
Moreddu E; Meister L; Philip-Alliez C; Triglia JM; Medale M; Nicollas R
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2019 Apr; 136(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 30528153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computational fluid dynamics and trigeminal sensory examinations of empty nose syndrome patients.
Li C; Farag AA; Leach J; Deshpande B; Jacobowitz A; Kim K; Otto BA; Zhao K
Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):E176-E184. PubMed ID: 28278356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What is normal nasal airflow? A computational study of 22 healthy adults.
Zhao K; Jiang J
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2014 Jun; 4(6):435-46. PubMed ID: 24664528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the intranasal flow field through computational fluid dynamics.
Hildebrandt T; Goubergrits L; Heppt WJ; Bessler S; Zachow S
Facial Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 23564240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Virtual rhinomanometry based on computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses in patients with nasal septum deviation a pilot study.
Chrzan R; Szaleniec J; Karbowski K; Kopiczak B; Gawlik J; Tomik J; Popiela T
Otolaryngol Pol; 2022 Oct; 77(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 36805513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity of nasal airflow variables computed via computational fluid dynamics to the computed tomography segmentation threshold.
Cherobin GB; Voegels RL; Gebrim EMMS; Garcia GJM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207178. PubMed ID: 30444909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regional peak mucosal cooling predicts the perception of nasal patency.
Zhao K; Jiang J; Blacker K; Lyman B; Dalton P; Cowart BJ; Pribitkin EA
Laryngoscope; 2014 Mar; 124(3):589-95. PubMed ID: 23775640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The importance of side difference in nasal obstruction and rhinomanometry: a retrospective correlation of symptoms and rhinomanometry in 1000 patients.
Thulesius HL; Cervin A; Jessen M
Clin Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 37(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22136145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Respiratory Fluid Mechanics of the Effect of Mouth Breathing on High-Arched Palate: Computational Fluid Dynamics Analyses.
Xie W; Zhang L; Shao J; Zhang C; Zhang Z; Zhang L
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 34(8):2302-2307. PubMed ID: 37427957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of peak nasal inspiratory flow and rhinomanometry in functional rhinosurgery.
Bermüller C; Kirsche H; Rettinger G; Riechelmann H
Laryngoscope; 2008 Apr; 118(4):605-10. PubMed ID: 18176341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [CT rhinometry : a correlation of rhinomanometry and multiplanar computer tomography of the nasal cavity].
Eichhorn KW; Schneider B; Bley TA; Wagner I; Schröck A; Jakob M
HNO; 2012 Dec; 60(12):1067-74. PubMed ID: 23202862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Odiosoft-Rhino versus rhinomanometry in healthy subjects.
Tahamiler R; Edizer DT; Canakcioglu S; Dirican A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Feb; 128(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 17851952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment.
Naito K; Miyata S; Saito S; Sakurai K; Takeuchi K
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 Dec; 258(10):505-8. PubMed ID: 11829185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of optical rhinometry and active anterior rhinomanometry using nasal provocation testing.
Wüstenberg EG; Zahnert T; Hüttenbrink KB; Hummel T
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Apr; 133(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 17438248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Nasal Obstruction on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment: Computational Fluid Dynamics Analyses.
Wakayama T; Suzuki M; Tanuma T
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150951. PubMed ID: 26943335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
