152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35821888)
21. Volume-based parameters on FDG PET may predict the proliferative potential of soft-tissue sarcomas.
Kitao T; Shiga T; Hirata K; Sekizawa M; Takei T; Yamashiro K; Tamaki N
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Jan; 33(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 30196378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of (18F)FDG PET/CT and (68Ga)DOTATATE PET/CT imaging methods in terms of detection of histological subtype and related SUVmax values in patients with pulmonary carcinoid tumors.
Komek H; Can C; Urakçi Z; Kepenek F
Nucl Med Commun; 2019 May; 40(5):517-524. PubMed ID: 30694875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Agents.
Hwang SH; Cho A; Yun M; Choi YD; Rha SY; Kang WJ
Clin Nucl Med; 2017 May; 42(5):e235-e241. PubMed ID: 28288043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic significance of standardized uptake value and metabolic tumour volume on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Kim JW; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(9):1353-61. PubMed ID: 26067088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden from (18)F-FDG PET in surgical patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang H; Wroblewski K; Liao S; Kampalath R; Penney BC; Zhang Y; Pu Y
Acad Radiol; 2013 Jan; 20(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 22999369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26.
Jreige M; Letovanec I; Chaba K; Renaud S; Rusakiewicz S; Cristina V; Peters S; Krueger T; de Leval L; Kandalaft LE; Nicod-Lalonde M; Romero P; Prior JO; Coukos G; Schaefer N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Aug; 46(9):1859-1868. PubMed ID: 31214790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Value of (18)F-FDG PET-CT imaging to predict epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma].
Zhao CY; Deng XY; Wang HS; Cao GP; Ding JN; Ding CY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 43(7):795-800. PubMed ID: 34289575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with 111In-octreotide in pulmonary carcinoid tumours correlated with pathological and 18FDG PET/CT findings.
Kuyumcu S; Adalet I; Sanli Y; Turkmen C; Ozkan ZG; Yilmazbayhan D
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 26(9):689-97. PubMed ID: 22802007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT for patients with advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].
Ding CY; Guo Z; Sun J; Yang WP; Li TR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 40(7):528-533. PubMed ID: 30060362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Prognostic significance of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma.
Calles-Sastre L; Mucientes-Rasilla J; San-Frutos Llorente LM; Royuela A; Garcia-Espantaleón Navas M; Herrero Gámiz S; Pérez-Medina T
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2019; 38(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 30366731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 18F-FDG PET/CT and circulating tumor cells in treatment-naive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.
Zhang F; Wu X; Zhu J; Huang Y; Song X; Jiang L
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Sep; 48(10):3250-3259. PubMed ID: 33630146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis on Preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.
Lee JW; Kang CM; Choi HJ; Lee WJ; Song SY; Lee JH; Lee JD
J Nucl Med; 2014 Jun; 55(6):898-904. PubMed ID: 24711649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in lymph node metastases and risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma.
Liu DD; Li J; Li X; Xie L; Qin L; Peng F; Cheng MH
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 30(6):e89. PubMed ID: 31576685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on
Hui Z; Wei F; Ren H; Xu W; Ren X
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2020 Oct; 146(10):2595-2605. PubMed ID: 32494919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Prognostic significance of semi-quantitative FDG-PET parameters in stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy.
Shrestha S; Higuchi T; Shirai K; Tokue A; Shrestha S; Saitoh JI; Hirasawa H; Ohno T; Nakano T; Tsushima Y
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1220-1227. PubMed ID: 31758225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Differential diagnostic value of
Zhao J; Wang H
Acad Radiol; 2022 Feb; 29 Suppl 2():S41-S46. PubMed ID: 33183953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Correlation of
Mayoral M; Paredes P; Saco A; Fusté P; Perlaza P; Tapias A; Fernandez-Martinez A; Vidal L; Ordi J; Pavia J; Martinez-Roman S; Lomeña F
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2018; 37(2):80-86. PubMed ID: 28869177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The prognostic value of
Grut H; Dueland S; Line PD; Revheim ME
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Feb; 45(2):218-225. PubMed ID: 29026950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic role of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary brain lymphoma.
Albano D; Bertoli M; Battistotti M; Rodella C; Statuto M; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Oct; 32(8):532-541. PubMed ID: 29982990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]