These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35821926)
1. Surgical Management of Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis of Tantalum Cones, Titanium Cones and Titanium Sleeves. Gibon E; Vasilopoulos T; Sipavicius E; Deen JT; Prieto HA; Gray CF; Parvataneni HK; Pulido L Iowa Orthop J; 2022 Jun; 42(1):145-153. PubMed ID: 35821926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up. Kayani B; Howard LC; Neufeld ME; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Garbuz DS J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S2):S374-S379. PubMed ID: 38508344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aseptic Loosening of Porous Metaphyseal Sleeves and Tantalum Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Roach RP; Clair AJ; Behery OA; Thakkar SC; Iorio R; Deshmukh AJ J Knee Surg; 2021 Aug; 34(10):1033-1041. PubMed ID: 32074656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Cones and Sleeves for Severe Proximal Tibial Bone Loss. Zitsch BP; Salaymeh JK; Burdyny MR; Buckner BC; Lyden ER; Konigsberg BS; Garvin KL; Hartman CW J Arthroplasty; 2024 Aug; 39(8S1):S256-S262. PubMed ID: 38604279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and Verification of Novel Porous Titanium Metaphyseal Cones for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Faizan A; Bhowmik-Stoker M; Alipit V; Kirk AE; Krebs VE; Harwin SF; Meneghini RM J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1946-1953. PubMed ID: 28196619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up. Girerd D; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Boureau F; Ollivier M; Pasquier G; Putman S; Migaud H; Argenson JN Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 102(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 27052939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study. Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report. Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tantalum Cones for Severe Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up. De Martino I; Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Singlitico A; Maccauro G; Gasparini G J Arthroplasty; 2023 May; 38(5):886-892. PubMed ID: 36481282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty. Tetreault MW; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):107-115. PubMed ID: 32475272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Excellent mid- to long-term survival of tantalum metal cones in a case series of revision knee arthroplasty with severe bony defects. Eder-Halbedl M; Fink A; Pietsch M; Djahani O; Hofmann S Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Dec; 31(12):5496-5506. PubMed ID: 37819600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up. Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intermediate-Term Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Small I; Meghpara M; Stein J; Goh GS; Banerjee S; Courtney PM J Arthroplasty; 2022 Sep; 37(9):1839-1843. PubMed ID: 35398228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Novel 3D-printed Stepped Porous Metal Cones and Metaphyseal Sleeves for Reconstruction of Severe Knee Bone Defects: Short-term Clinical Outcomes. Liu Y; Shen J; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Ma H; Zhou Y Orthop Surg; 2024 Jul; 16(7):1657-1664. PubMed ID: 38790115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Loss in Revision TKA. Watters TS; Martin JR; Levy DL; Yang CC; Kim RH; Dennis DA J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3468-3473. PubMed ID: 28697864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]