133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35822406)
1. Re: Inaccuracies in electronic health records smoking data and a potential approach to address resulting underestimation in determining lung cancer screening eligibility.
Kukhareva P; Caverly T; Kawamoto K
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2022 Aug; 29(9):1655. PubMed ID: 35822406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: Inaccuracies in electronic health records smoking data and a potential approach to address resulting underestimation in determining lung cancer screening eligibility.
Tarabichi Y; Thornton JD
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2022 Aug; 29(9):1654. PubMed ID: 35822414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Inaccuracies in electronic health records smoking data and a potential approach to address resulting underestimation in determining lung cancer screening eligibility.
Kukhareva PV; Caverly TJ; Li H; Katki HA; Cheung LC; Reese TJ; Del Fiol G; Hess R; Wetter DW; Zhang Y; Taft TY; Flynn MC; Kawamoto K
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2022 Apr; 29(5):779-788. PubMed ID: 35167675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk prediction models versus simplified selection criteria to determine eligibility for lung cancer screening: an analysis of German federal-wide survey and incidence data.
Hüsing A; Kaaks R
Eur J Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 35(10):899-912. PubMed ID: 32594286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of Smoking History in the Electronic Health Record With Self-Report.
Patel N; Miller DP; Snavely AC; Bellinger C; Foley KL; Case D; McDonald ML; Masmoudi YR; Dharod A
Am J Prev Med; 2020 Apr; 58(4):591-595. PubMed ID: 31982229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Using Simplified Criteria.
Triplette M; Donovan LM; Crothers K; Madtes DK; Au DH
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2019 Oct; 16(10):1280-1285. PubMed ID: 31298946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimising eligibility criteria for lung cancer screening.
Crosbie PAJ; Callister MEJ
Lancet Respir Med; 2023 Aug; 11(8):665-666. PubMed ID: 37030306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating Pack-Year Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening Using 2 Yes or No Questions.
Rendle KA; Steltz JP; Cohen S; Schapira MM; Wender RC; Bekelman JE; Vachani A
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Aug; 6(8):e2327363. PubMed ID: 37548980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical implications of changing the eligibility criteria for the proposed National Lung Cancer Screening Program.
Ryan JB
Med J Aust; 2023 Aug; 219(4):187. PubMed ID: 37517815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Utilisation of primary care electronic patient records for identification and targeted invitation of individuals to a lung cancer screening programme.
Dickson JL; Hall H; Horst C; Tisi S; Verghese P; Worboys S; Perugia A; Rusius J; Mullin AM; Teague J; Farrelly L; Bowyer V; Gyertson K; Bojang F; Levermore C; Anastasiadis T; McCabe J; Devaraj A; Nair A; Navani N; Hackshaw A; Quaife SL; Janes SM;
Lung Cancer; 2022 Nov; 173():94-100. PubMed ID: 36179541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential Impact of Criteria Modifications on Race and Sex Disparities in Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening.
Smeltzer MP; Liao W; Faris NR; Fehnel C; Goss J; Shepherd CJ; Ramos R; Qureshi T; Mukhopadhyay A; Ray MA; Osarogiagbon RU
J Thorac Oncol; 2023 Feb; 18(2):158-168. PubMed ID: 36208717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pack-Year Cigarette Smoking History for Determination of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility. Comparison of the Electronic Medical Record versus a Shared Decision-making Conversation.
Modin HE; Fathi JT; Gilbert CR; Wilshire CL; Wilson AK; Aye RW; Farivar AS; Louie BE; Vallières E; Gorden JA
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Aug; 14(8):1320-1325. PubMed ID: 28406708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized Electronic Promotion of Lung Cancer Screening: A Pilot.
Begnaud AL; Joseph AM; Lindgren BR
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2017 Nov; 1():1-6. PubMed ID: 30657381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving Lung Cancer Screening Rates Through an Evidence-Based Electronic Health Record Smoking History.
Russell CK; McNeill M
J Nurs Care Qual; 2022 Jul-Sep 01; 37(3):263-268. PubMed ID: 35380553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potential Disparities by Sex and Race or Ethnicity in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Rates.
Pinsky PF; Lau YK; Doubeni CA
Chest; 2021 Jul; 160(1):341-350. PubMed ID: 33545164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Addressing Sex Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility: USPSTF vs PLCOm2012 Criteria.
Pasquinelli MM; Tammemägi MC; Kovitz KL; Durham ML; Deliu Z; Guzman A; Rygalski K; Liu L; Koshy M; Finn P; Feldman LE
Chest; 2022 Jan; 161(1):248-256. PubMed ID: 34252436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age, Sex, Smoking, and Race: Is Progress Being Made in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility?
Sears CR; Rivera MP
Chest; 2021 Jul; 160(1):31-33. PubMed ID: 34246372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving smoking history documentation in the electronic health record for lung cancer risk assessment and screening in primary care: A case study.
Peterson E; Harris K; Farjah F; Akinsoto N; Marcotte LM
Healthc (Amst); 2021 Dec; 9(4):100578. PubMed ID: 34450358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Among Cancer Survivors Who Ever Smoked.
Wang Q; Hsu ML; Lin JJ; Wisnivesky J; Cullen J; Dowlati A; Kong CY
J Gen Intern Med; 2024 May; 39(7):1272-1275. PubMed ID: 38321314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Monitoring Lung Cancer Screening Use and Outcomes at Four Cancer Research Network Sites.
Gould MK; Sakoda LC; Ritzwoller DP; Simoff MJ; Neslund-Dudas CM; Kushi LH; Carter-Harris L; Feigelson HS; Minowada G; Doria-Rose VP
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Dec; 14(12):1827-1835. PubMed ID: 28683215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
