These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35822444)

  • 1. Replacing bar graphs of continuous data with more informative graphics: are we making progress?
    Riedel N; Schulz R; Kazezian V; Weissgerber T
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2022 Aug; 136(15):1139-1156. PubMed ID: 35822444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reveal, Don't Conceal: Transforming Data Visualization to Improve Transparency.
    Weissgerber TL; Winham SJ; Heinzen EP; Milin-Lazovic JS; Garcia-Valencia O; Bukumiric Z; Savic MD; Garovic VD; Milic NM
    Circulation; 2019 Oct; 140(18):1506-1518. PubMed ID: 31657957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Data visualization, bar naked: A free tool for creating interactive graphics.
    Weissgerber TL; Savic M; Winham SJ; Stanisavljevic D; Garovic VD; Milic NM
    J Biol Chem; 2017 Dec; 292(50):20592-20598. PubMed ID: 28974579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond bar and line graphs: time for a new data presentation paradigm.
    Weissgerber TL; Milic NM; Winham SJ; Garovic VD
    PLoS Biol; 2015 Apr; 13(4):e1002128. PubMed ID: 25901488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visualization formats of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a systematic review about preferences and interpretation accuracy.
    Albers EAC; Fraterman I; Walraven I; Wilthagen E; Schagen SB; van der Ploeg IM; Wouters MWJM; van de Poll-Franse LV; de Ligt KM
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2022 Mar; 6(1):18. PubMed ID: 35239055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speaking graphically: an introduction to some newer graphing techniques.
    Streiner DL
    Can J Psychiatry; 1997 May; 42(4):388-94. PubMed ID: 9161763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Description of continuous data using bar graphs: a misleading approach.
    Martinez EZ
    Rev Soc Bras Med Trop; 2015; 48(4):494-7. PubMed ID: 26132497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Graph schema and best graph type to compare discrete groups: Bar, line, and pie.
    Zhao F; Gaschler R
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():991420. PubMed ID: 36600703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Graphics and statistics for cardiology: comparing categorical and continuous variables.
    Rice K; Lumley T
    Heart; 2016 Mar; 102(5):349-55. PubMed ID: 26819235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On Effective Graphic Communication of Health Inequality: Considerations for Health Policy Researchers.
    Asada Y; Abel H; Skedgel C; Warner G
    Milbank Q; 2017 Dec; 95(4):801-835. PubMed ID: 29226437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Judgments of change and proportion in graphical perception.
    Hollands JG; Spence I
    Hum Factors; 1992 Jun; 34(3):313-34. PubMed ID: 1634243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Best Graph Type to Compare Discrete Groups: Bar, Dot, and Tally.
    Zhao F; Gaschler R
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():775721. PubMed ID: 35002865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating Bar Graph Averages: Overcoming Within-the-Bar Bias.
    Kang H; Ji J; Yun Y; Han K
    Iperception; 2021; 12(1):2041669520987254. PubMed ID: 33613956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Picture Tells 1000 Words (but Most Results Graphs Do Not): 21 Alternatives to Simple Bar and Line Graphs.
    Hertel J
    Clin Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 37(3):441-462. PubMed ID: 29903385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding and preferences regarding risk communication during pregnancy: a survey to facilitate provider communication with patients.
    Ferguson M; Shapiro GD; McDonald SD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100929. PubMed ID: 36931434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introducing hat graphs.
    Witt JK
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Aug; 4(1):31. PubMed ID: 31414198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two graphs walk into a bar: Readout-based measurement reveals the Bar-Tip Limit error, a common, categorical misinterpretation of mean bar graphs.
    Kerns SH; Wilmer JB
    J Vis; 2021 Nov; 21(12):17. PubMed ID: 34846520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Descriptive statistics].
    Rendón-Macías ME; Villasís-Keever MÁ; Miranda-Novales MG
    Rev Alerg Mex; 2016; 63(4):397-407. PubMed ID: 27795220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Peer Review on the Quality of Data Graphs in Annals of Emergency Medicine.
    Schriger DL; Raffetto B; Drolen C; Cooper RJ
    Ann Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 69(4):444-452.e2. PubMed ID: 27614587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Graphical display of categorical data.
    Singer PA; Feinstein AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Mar; 46(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8455047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.