These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3582716)
1. Is X-ray pelvimetry useful in a trial of labour after caesarean section? Lao TT; Chin RK; Leung BF Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1987 Apr; 24(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 3582716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Is there a role for X-ray pelvimetry in the twenty-first century?]. Rozenberg P Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 17188014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: X-ray pelvimetry at term is informative. Sibony O; Alran S; Oury JF J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(3):212-5. PubMed ID: 16602841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. X-ray pelvimetry and labour outcome in term pregnancy in a rural Nigerian population. Irurhe NK; Duru FI; Ibeabuchi NM; Adewunmi MA; Okanlawon OA; Adekola OO Nig Q J Hosp Med; 2012; 22(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 23175909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Is there still any interest of x-ray pelvimetry for women with a scarred uterus]. Peultier AS; Cazenave N; Boog G J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2010 Feb; 39(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 20036468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. X-ray Pelvimetry Has No Impact on the Outcomes of Trial of Labor after Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Single-center Study. Komatsu M; Chigusa Y; Murakami R; Takakura M; Mandai M; Mogami H Kobe J Med Sci; 2024 Jun; 70(2):E70-E76. PubMed ID: 38936881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Which Foetal-Pelvic Variables Are Useful for Predicting Caesarean Section and Instrumental Assistance? Frémondière P; Thollon L; Adalian P; Delotte J; Marchal F Med Princ Pract; 2017; 26(4):359-367. PubMed ID: 28538223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maternal height, birthweight, obstetric conjugate and their influence on the management of parturients with a previous cesarean scar. Mahmood TA Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1989; 68(7):595-8. PubMed ID: 2631526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of postnatal x-ray pelvimetry after caesarean section in the management of subsequent delivery. Krishnamurthy S; Fairlie F; Cameron AD; Walker JJ; Mackenzie JR Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Jul; 98(7):716-8. PubMed ID: 1883799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Erect lateral pelvimetry and the outcome of labor in Lagos. Ogedengbe OK; Okikiolu O; Macrae RI; Giwa-Osagie OF J Natl Med Assoc; 1993 Jan; 85(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 8426383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vaginal breech delivery: a five-year prospective evaluation of a protocol using computed tomographic pelvimetry. Christian SS; Brady K; Read JA; Kopelman JN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 163(3):848-55. PubMed ID: 2403165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of X-ray pelvimetry in previous caesarean section pregnancies. Wright M S Afr Med J; 1985 Sep; 68(6):409-11. PubMed ID: 4035514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of pelvimetry in active management of labour. Joyce DN; Giwa-Osagie F; Stevenson GW Br Med J; 1975 Nov; 4(5995):505-7. PubMed ID: 1192147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vaginal delivery following caesarean section. Ngu A; Quinn MA Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Feb; 25(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 3899089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An appraisal of computed tomography pelvimetry in patients with previous caesarean section. Abu-Ghazzeh YM; Barqawi R East Mediterr Health J; 2000; 6(2-3):260-4. PubMed ID: 11556010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomised controlled trial of magnetic-resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation at term. van Loon AJ; Mantingh A; Serlier EK; Kroon G; Mooyaart EL; Huisjes HJ Lancet; 1997 Dec 20-27; 350(9094):1799-804. PubMed ID: 9428250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The predictability of labor outcome from a comparison of birth weight and x-ray pelvimetry. Jagani N; Schulman H; Chandra P; Gonzalez R; Fleischer A Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 139(5):507-11. PubMed ID: 7468717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]