84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3582757)
1. Use of a dynamic filtration method for separation of animal cells.
Rebsamen E; Goldinger W; Scheirer W; Merten OW; Pálfi GE
Dev Biol Stand; 1987; 66():273-7. PubMed ID: 3582757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Separation of viable and nonviable animal cell using dielectrophoretic filter.
Hakoda M; Wakizaka Y; Hirota Y
Biotechnol Prog; 2010; 26(4):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20205163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-laboratory evaluation of procedures for reducing the volume of cord blood: influence on cell recoveries.
Takahashi TA; Rebulla P; Armitage S; van Beckhoven J; Eichler H; Kekomäki R; Letowska M; Wahab F; Moroff G
Cytotherapy; 2006; 8(3):254-64. PubMed ID: 16793734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Engraftment capacity of umbilical cord blood cells processed by either whole blood preparation or filtration.
Eichler H; Kern S; Beck C; Zieger W; Klüter H
Stem Cells; 2003; 21(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 12634417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scale-up of controlled-shear affinity filtration using computational fluid dynamics.
Francis P; Haynes CA
Biotechnol J; 2009 May; 4(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 19452478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Filtration induces changes in activity states and leucocyte populations.
Trindade H; Carvalho H; Sousa G; Machado Caetano JA; Seghatchian J
Transfus Apher Sci; 2003 Jun; 28(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 12725959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Separation characteristics of animal cells using a dielectrophoretic filter.
Hirota Y; Hakoda M; Wakizaka Y
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2010 Jun; 33(5):607-12. PubMed ID: 19838737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CFD-aided design of a dynamic filter for mammalian cell separation.
Castilho LR; Anspach FB
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 Sep; 83(5):514-24. PubMed ID: 12827693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immunobead filtration: a novel approach for the isolation and propagation of tumor cells.
Rye PD; Høifødt HK; Overli GE; Fodstad O
Am J Pathol; 1997 Jan; 150(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 9006327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of the Centritech Lab centrifuge for perfusion culture of hybridoma cells in protein-free medium.
Johnson M; Lanthier S; Massie B; Lefebvre G; Kamen AA
Biotechnol Prog; 1996; 12(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 8983210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel ultrasonic resonance field device for the retention of animal cells.
Doblhoff-Dier O; Gaida T; Katinger H; Burger W; Gröschl M; Benes E
Biotechnol Prog; 1994; 10(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 7765096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large scale recovery and characterization of stromal cell-associated primitive haemopoietic progenitor cells from filter-retained human bone marrow.
Blazsek I; Delmas Marsalet B; Legras S; Marion S; Machover D; Misset JL
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Apr; 23(7):647-57. PubMed ID: 10218840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An integrated process for mammalian cell perfusion cultivation and product purification using a dynamic filter.
Castilho LR; Anspach FB; Deckwer WD
Biotechnol Prog; 2002; 18(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 12153312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of an acoustic cell filter with a novel air-backflush system.
Gorenflo VM; Angepat S; Bowen BD; Piret JM
Biotechnol Prog; 2003; 19(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 12573003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated liver cell processing facilitates large scale isolation and purification of porcine hepatocytes.
Morsiani E; Rozga J; Scott HC; Lebow LT; Moscioni AD; Kong LB; McGrath MF; Demetriou AA
ASAIO J; 1995; 41(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 7640419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acoustic cell filter: a proven cell retention technology for perfusion of animal cell cultures.
Shirgaonkar IZ; Lanthier S; Kamen A
Biotechnol Adv; 2004 Jul; 22(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 15135491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Isolation of viable human tumor cells and their characteristics during culturing in diffusion chambers].
Semenova-Kobzar' RA; Iakhimovich LV; Liul'kin VD; Konovalenko VF; Palivets AIu
Eksp Onkol; 1987; 9(2):40-2. PubMed ID: 3582238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The separation of harvested cells from microcarriers: a comparison of methods.
Billig D; Clark JM; Ewell AJ; Carter CM; Gebb C
Dev Biol Stand; 1983; 55():67-75. PubMed ID: 6677541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuous blood cell separation by hydrophoretic filtration.
Choi S; Song S; Choi C; Park JK
Lab Chip; 2007 Nov; 7(11):1532-8. PubMed ID: 17960282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Separation of viable tumor cells from nonviable tumor cells by flotation on bovine serum albumin. A short communication.
Wepsic HT
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1970 Nov; 45(5):1031-3. PubMed ID: 18605430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]