These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3582801)

  • 1. High pass digital and analog filtering of the middle latency response.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD
    Ear Hear; 1987 Apr; 8(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 3582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analog and digital filtering of the brain stem auditory evoked response.
    Kavanagh KT; Franks R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Jul; 98(7 Pt 1):508-14. PubMed ID: 2751210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital filtering and spectral analysis of the low intensity ABR.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD; Franks R; Han JC
    Ear Hear; 1988 Feb; 9(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3342945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analog and zero phase-shift digital filtering of the auditory brain stem response waveform.
    Domico WD; Kavanagh KT
    Ear Hear; 1986 Dec; 7(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 3792680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-pass digital filtration of the 40 Hz response and its relationship to the spectral content of the middle latency and 40 Hz responses.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD
    Ear Hear; 1986 Apr; 7(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 3699264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distortion of the middle latency auditory response produced by analog filtering.
    Scherg M
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 7178804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of analog and digital filtering on brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Boston JR; Ainslie PJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Mar; 48(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 6153356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analogue and digital filtering of auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 7280545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bessel filtering of brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Apr; 51(4):446-8. PubMed ID: 6164544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the intrasubject repeatability of auditory brain stem and middle latency responses elicited in young children.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD; Crews PL; McCormick VA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1988; 97(3 Pt 1):264-71. PubMed ID: 3377393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of high-pass filter frequency and slope on BAEP amplitude, latency and wave form.
    Elton M; Scherg M; Von Cramon D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 May; 57(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 6201344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Highpass filtering of auditory evoked brain stem potentials (author's transl)].
    Kiessling J; Althaus V
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 230(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 7295174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short latency somatosensory and spinal evoked potentials: power spectra and comparison between high pass analog and digital filter.
    Maccabee PJ; Hassan NF; Cracco RQ; Schiff JA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 65(3):177-87. PubMed ID: 2420570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of analog filtering on brain stem auditory-evoked potentials in dogs.
    Kawasaki Y; Inada S
    Am J Vet Res; 1992 Jul; 53(7):1096-100. PubMed ID: 1497176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of analog and digital filtering on auditory middle latency responses in adults and young children.
    Suzuki T; Hirabayashi M; Kobayashi K
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1984; 93(3 Pt 1):267-70. PubMed ID: 6732112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of digital filtering on feline auditory brain-stem evoked potentials.
    Pratt H; Bleich N; Zaaroor M; Starr A
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991; 80(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 1720734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital inverse filtering of distorted auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 7323677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power spectrum and optimal filtering for visual evoked potentials to pattern reversal.
    Skuse NF; Burke D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 1691972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Unrecognized errors due to analog filtering of the brain-stem auditory evoked response.
    Janssen R; Benignus VA; Grimes LM; Dyer RS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 65(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 2420573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.