218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35829927)
21. The application of discrete choice experiments eliciting young peoples' preferences for healthcare: a systematic literature review.
Williams G; Kinchin I
Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Aug; 24(6):987-998. PubMed ID: 36169764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patients' preferences for the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Tünneßen M; Hiligsmann M; Stock S; Vennedey V
J Med Econ; 2020 Jun; 23(6):546-556. PubMed ID: 32011209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.
Quaife M; Terris-Prestholt F; Di Tanna GL; Vickerman P
Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Nov; 19(8):1053-1066. PubMed ID: 29380229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review.
Salloum RG; Shenkman EA; Louviere JJ; Chambers DA
Implement Sci; 2017 Nov; 12(1):140. PubMed ID: 29169397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Are Efficient Designs Used in Discrete Choice Experiments Too Difficult for Some Respondents? A Case Study Eliciting Preferences for End-of-Life Care.
Flynn TN; Bilger M; Malhotra C; Finkelstein EA
Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Mar; 34(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26589411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Mapping Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.
Neal DE; Feit EM; Etzkorn JR
Dermatol Surg; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1041-1049. PubMed ID: 30045140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Systematic review and validity assessment of methods used in discrete choice experiments of primary healthcare professionals.
Merlo G; van Driel M; Hall L
Health Econ Rev; 2020 Dec; 10(1):39. PubMed ID: 33296066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does the inclusion of a cost attribute result in different preferences for the surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma?: a comparison of two discrete-choice experiments.
Essers BA; van Helvoort-Postulart D; Prins MH; Neumann M; Dirksen CD
Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(6):507-20. PubMed ID: 20387912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient preferences for epilepsy treatment: a systematic review of discrete choice experimental studies.
Al-Aqeel S; Alotaiwi R; Albugami B
Health Econ Rev; 2023 Mar; 13(1):17. PubMed ID: 36933108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.
Soekhai V; de Bekker-Grob EW; Ellis AR; Vass CM
Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Feb; 37(2):201-226. PubMed ID: 30392040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.
Joy SM; Little E; Maruthur NM; Purnell TS; Bridges JF
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Oct; 31(10):877-92. PubMed ID: 24081453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare Discrete Choice Experiments: A Primer.
Vass CM; Wright S; Burton M; Payne K
Patient; 2018 Apr; 11(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 29032437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Attribute Development in Health-related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Methods and Techniques to Inform Quantitative Instruments.
Bohorquez NG; Malatzky C; McPhail SM; Mitchell R; Ai Lim MH; Kularatna S
Value Health; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38851483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Patient preferences in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Zhu M; Dong D; Lo HH; Wong SY; Mo PK; Sit RW
Pain; 2023 Apr; 164(4):675-689. PubMed ID: 36149784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments.
Vass C; Rigby D; Payne K
Med Decis Making; 2017 Apr; 37(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 28061040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation.
Mulhern B; Norman R; Street DJ; Viney R
Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Jan; 37(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 30194624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Vaccine preferences driving vaccine-decision making of different target groups: a systematic review of choice-based experiments.
Diks ME; Hiligsmann M; van der Putten IM
BMC Infect Dis; 2021 Aug; 21(1):879. PubMed ID: 34454441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A novel design process for selection of attributes for inclusion in discrete choice experiments: case study exploring variation in clinical decision-making about thrombolysis in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke.
De Brún A; Flynn D; Ternent L; Price CI; Rodgers H; Ford GA; Rudd M; Lancsar E; Simpson S; Teah J; Thomson RG
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):483. PubMed ID: 29929523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.
Hall R; Medina-Lara A; Hamilton W; Spencer AE
Patient; 2022 May; 15(3):269-285. PubMed ID: 34671946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.
Vass C; Gray E; Payne K
Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Jun; 38(3):620-30. PubMed ID: 26610687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
