315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35831175)
1. Remote Delivery in Reproductive Health Care: Operation of Direct-to-Patient Telehealth Medication Abortion Services in Diverse Settings.
Fiastro AE; Sanan S; Jacob-Files E; Wells E; Coeytaux F; Ruben MR; Bennett IM; Godfrey EM
Ann Fam Med; 2022; 20(4):336-342. PubMed ID: 35831175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors associated with successful implementation of telehealth abortion in 4 United States clinical practice settings.
Godfrey EM; Fiastro AE; Jacob-Files EA; Coeytaux FM; Wells ES; Ruben MR; Sanan SS; Bennett IM
Contraception; 2021 Jul; 104(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 33932401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Tschann M; Ly ES; Hilliard S; Lange HLH
Contraception; 2021 Jul; 104(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 33894247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient Perspectives Regarding Clinician Communication During Telemedicine Compared With In-Clinic Abortion.
Godfrey EM; Fiastro AE; Ruben MR; Young EV; Bennett IM; Jacob-Files E
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jun; 141(6):1139-1153. PubMed ID: 37141602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mailing abortion pills does not delay care: A cohort study comparing mailed to in-person dispensing of abortion medications in the United States.
Koenig LR; Raymond EG; Gold M; Boraas CM; Kaneshiro B; Winikoff B; Coplon L; Upadhyay UD
Contraception; 2023 May; 121():109962. PubMed ID: 36736715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The association of U.S. state-level abortion restrictions with medication abortion service delivery innovations during the early COVID-19 pandemic.
Janiak E; Belizaire C; Liu J; Fulcher IR
Contraception; 2022 Sep; 113():26-29. PubMed ID: 35430237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Telehealth in remote Australia: a supplementary tool or an alternative model of care replacing face-to-face consultations?
Mathew S; Fitts MS; Liddle Z; Bourke L; Campbell N; Murakami-Gold L; Russell DJ; Humphreys JS; Mullholand E; Zhao Y; Jones MP; Boffa J; Ramjan M; Tangey A; Schultz R; Wakerman J
BMC Health Serv Res; 2023 Apr; 23(1):341. PubMed ID: 37020234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Family medicine provision of online medication abortion in three US states during COVID-19.
Godfrey EM; Thayer EK; Fiastro AE; Aiken ARA; Gomperts R
Contraception; 2021 Jul; 104(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 33939985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Provision of Abortion Care via Telehealth in the United States: A Rapid Review.
Brown C; Neerland CE; Weinfurter EV; Saftner MA
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2023; 68(6):744-758. PubMed ID: 38069588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "I totally didn't need to be there in person": New York women's preferences for telehealth consultations for sexual and reproductive healthcare in primary care.
Srinivasulu S; Manze MG; Jones HE
Fam Pract; 2023 Mar; 40(2):402-406. PubMed ID: 36124892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Remote Reproductive Rights.
Rebouché R
Am J Law Med; 2022 Jul; 48(2-3):244-255. PubMed ID: 36715252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes and Safety of History-Based Screening for Medication Abortion: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.
Upadhyay UD; Raymond EG; Koenig LR; Coplon L; Gold M; Kaneshiro B; Boraas CM; Winikoff B
JAMA Intern Med; 2022 May; 182(5):482-491. PubMed ID: 35311911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Client and Clinician Experiences and Perspectives of Exercise Physiology Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study.
Brown RCC; Keating SE; Owen PJ; Jansons PS; McVicar J; Askew CD; Clanchy KM; Maddison R; Maiorana A; Robinson SM; Mundell NL
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e46370. PubMed ID: 38127430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing differences in contraceptive provision through telemedicine among reproductive health providers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.
Comfort AB; Rao L; Goodman S; Raine-Bennett T; Barney A; Mengesha B; Harper CC
Reprod Health; 2022 Apr; 19(1):99. PubMed ID: 35459218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "It was close enough, but it wasn't close enough": A qualitative exploration of the impact of direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion on access to abortion care.
Kerestes C; Delafield R; Elia J; Chong E; Kaneshiro B; Soon R
Contraception; 2021 Jul; 104(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 33933421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Alaska: Through the provider's lens.
Grindlay K; Grossman D
J Telemed Telecare; 2017 Aug; 23(7):680-685. PubMed ID: 27418557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Federal, state, and institutional barriers to the expansion of medication and telemedicine abortion services in Ohio, Kentucky, and West Virginia during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Mello K; Smith MH; Hill BJ; Chakraborty P; Rivlin K; Bessett D; Norris AH; McGowan ML
Contraception; 2021 Jul; 104(1):111-116. PubMed ID: 33930382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Telehealth Medication Abortion in Primary Care: A Comparison to Usual in-Clinic Care.
Srinivasulu S; Nyandak D; Fiastro AE; MacNaughton H; Tressan A; Godfrey EM
J Am Board Fam Med; 2024; 37(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 38740468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early abortion care during the COVID-19 public health emergency in Ireland: Implications for law, policy, and service delivery.
Spillane A; Taylor M; Henchion C; Venables R; Conlon C
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Aug; 154(2):379-384. PubMed ID: 33893642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Telehealth for Addressing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: A Hybrid Telemedicine-Community Accompaniment Model for Abortion and Contraception Services in Pakistan.
Shaikh I; Küng SA; Aziz H; Sabir S; Shabbir G; Ahmed M; Dabash R
Front Glob Womens Health; 2021; 2():705262. PubMed ID: 34816237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
