These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35831406)

  • 1. Cross-sectional computed tomography assessment of exophthalmos in comparison to clinical measurement via Hertel exophthalmometry.
    Klingenstein A; Samel C; Garip-Kübler A; Hintschich C; Müller-Lisse UG
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11973. PubMed ID: 35831406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proptosis--Correlation and Agreement between Hertel Exophthalmometry and Computed Tomography.
    Ramli N; Kala S; Samsudin A; Rahmat K; Abidin ZZ
    Orbit; 2015; 34(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 26186249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison of Measurement Methods of Exophthalmos and Its Forensic Significance].
    Tan SL; Chen JM; Yu XY; Wang MW; Zhuo PP; Zhou S; Xia WT
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 33(4):353-356. PubMed ID: 29219263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative en- and exophthalmometry in zygomatic fractures comparing optical non-contact, non-ionizing 3D imaging to the Hertel instrument and computed tomography.
    Nkenke E; Benz M; Maier T; Wiltfang J; Holbach LM; Kramer M; Häusler G; Neukam FW
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2003 Dec; 31(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 14637065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hertel exophthalmometry versus computed tomography and optical 3D imaging for the determination of the globe position in zygomatic fractures.
    Nkenke E; Maier T; Benz M; Wiltfang J; Holbach LM; Kramer M; Häusler G; Neukam FW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 33(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 15050067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of exophthalmos measurements: Hertel exophthalmometer versus orbital parameters in 2-dimensional computed tomography.
    Choi KJ; Lee MJ
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 53(4):384-390. PubMed ID: 30119794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hertel exophthalmometer versus computed tomography scan in proptosis estimation in thyroid-associated orbitopathy.
    Park NR; Moon JH; Lee JK
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():1461-1467. PubMed ID: 31447545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hertel-exophthalmometry-like multi-detector-row-CT-exophthalmometry: inter-disciplinary inter-observer reproducibility of measurements.
    Muller-Lisse UG; Garip-Kuebler A; Murer S; Fuchsgruber F; Braeuninger C; Flatz W; Priglinger S; Hintschich C; Klingenstein A
    Br J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 96(1148):20211408. PubMed ID: 37334789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computed exophthalmometry is an accurate and reproducible method for the measuring of eyeballs' protrusion.
    Afanasyeva DS; Gushchina MB; Gerasimov MY; Borzenok SA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 46(3):461-465. PubMed ID: 29325888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utilizing a mobile platform to obtain quantitative measurements of exophthalmos.
    Magazin M; Tran AQ; Tooley AA
    Orbit; 2022 Oct; 41(5):591-597. PubMed ID: 34542003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of exophthalmos measurement and the exophthalmometry value distribution in a healthy Dutch population and in Graves' patients. An exploratory study.
    Mourits MP; Lombardo SH; van der Sluijs FA; Fenton S
    Orbit; 2004 Sep; 23(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 15545129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed Tomography Measurements as a Standard of Exophthalmos? Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Techniques.
    Guo J; Qian J; Yuan Y
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 May; 43(5):647-653. PubMed ID: 29377729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Value of Multidetector Computed Tomography of Orbits in Globe Protrusion in Comparison to Hertel Exophthalmometry.
    Đorić I; Žarković M; Radojičić Z; Repac N; Janićijević A; Rotim K; Tasić G; Rasulić L
    Acta Clin Croat; 2017 Mar; 56(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 29120123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra-observer and inter-observer variation of Hertel exophthalmometry.
    Lam AK; Lam CF; Leung WK; Hung PK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Jul; 29(4):472-6. PubMed ID: 19523092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of unilateral and simultaneous bilateral measurement of the globe position, using the Hertel exophthalmometer.
    Ameri H; Fenton S
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Nov; 20(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 15599245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Normal range of exophthalmos values on orbit computerized tomography in Koreans.
    Kim IT; Choi JB
    Ophthalmologica; 2001; 215(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 11340383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical exophthalmometry: a comparative study of the Luedde and Hertel exophthalmometers.
    Chang AA; Bank A; Francis IC; Kappagoda MB
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1995 Nov; 23(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 11980078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exophthalmometry values of Turkish adult population and the effect of age, sex, refractive status, and Hertel base values on Hertel readings.
    Beden U; Ozarslan Y; Oztürk HE; Sönmez B; Erkan D; Oge I
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 18320506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Smartphone Exophthalmometry to Measure Eyeball Protrusion.
    Popov T; Fierz FC; Bockisch CJ; Weber KP
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2023 Oct; 141(10):974-981. PubMed ID: 37733348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Comparative Study of Clinical vs. Digital Exophthalmometry Measurement Methods.
    Pereira TS; Kuniyoshi CH; Leite CA; Gebrim EMMS; Monteiro MLR; Pieroni Gonçalves AC
    J Ophthalmol; 2020; 2020():1397410. PubMed ID: 32280513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.