These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35833527)
1. On the reliability of clinical attachment level measurements. van der Velden U J Clin Periodontol; 2022 Nov; 49(11):1229-1231. PubMed ID: 35833527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of pocket depth and attachment level measurements when using a flexible splint. Isidor F; Karring T; Attström R J Clin Periodontol; 1984 Nov; 11(10):662-8. PubMed ID: 6594353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of attachment level measurements with two models of the Florida Probe. Marks RG; Low SB; Taylor M; Baggs R; Magnusson I; Clark WB J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 18(10):780-4. PubMed ID: 1753003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A periodontal probe with automated cemento--enamel junction detection-design and clinical trials. Jeffcoat MK; Jeffcoat RL; Captain K IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Apr; 38(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 1855793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of clinical attachment level and probing depth of a manual probe and a computerized electronic probe. Alves Rde V; Machion L; Andia DC; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA J Int Acad Periodontol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15736893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of single and double probing attachment level measurements. Zappa U; Simona C; Graf H; Case D; Thomas J J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Oct; 22(10):764-71. PubMed ID: 8682923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of attachment level recordings using an electronic and a conventional probe. Villata L; Baelum V J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1292-300. PubMed ID: 8997676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Depth-force patterns of periodontal probing. Attachment-gain in relation to probing force. Mombelli A; Mühle T; Frigg R J Clin Periodontol; 1992 May; 19(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 1517472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe. Osborn J; Stoltenberg J; Huso B; Aeppli D; Pihlstrom B J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):497-503. PubMed ID: 2391627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of gingival attachment level measurements with an automated periodontal probe and a pressure-sensitive probe. McCulloch CA; Birek P; Hardy V J Periodontal Res; 1987 Sep; 22(5):348-52. PubMed ID: 2961865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Where is the pocket? Pocket depth vs. clinical attachment level. Gutter AS Dent Today; 1991 Sep; 10(7):66-8. PubMed ID: 1812924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A study of inter- and intra-examiner reliability of pocket depth and attachment level. Fleiss JL; Mann J; Paik M; Goultchin J; Chilton NW J Periodontal Res; 1991 Mar; 26(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 1826526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparisons of clinical and radiographic measurements of inter-proximal vertical defects before and 1 year after surgical treatments. Zybutz M; Rapoport D; Laurell L; Persson GR J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Mar; 27(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 10743864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reproducibility of an electronic probe in relative attachment level measurements. Yang MC; Marks RG; Magnusson I; Clouser B; Clark WB J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):541-8. PubMed ID: 1447378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of periodontal probing using a conventional manual and an automated force-controlled electronic probe. Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA J Periodontol; 1995 Jan; 66(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 7891248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]