These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35833609)

  • 1. Validity of the self-rated 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 as a measure of functioning in Swedish psychiatric outpatients.
    Ramklint M; Söderberg P; Tungström S; Nordenskjöld A; Hermansson L
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2023 Apr; 77(3):276-281. PubMed ID: 35833609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders.
    Holmberg C; Gremyr A; Torgerson J; Mehlig K
    BMC Psychiatry; 2021 Mar; 21(1):147. PubMed ID: 33691655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in schizophrenia.
    Gspandl S; Peirson RP; Nahhas RW; Skale TG; Lehrer DS
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Jan; 259():251-253. PubMed ID: 29091824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish self-rated 36-item version of WHODAS 2.0 for use in psychiatric populations - using classical test theory.
    Midhage R; Hermansson L; Söderberg P; Tungström S; Nordenskjöld A; Svanborg C; Ginsberg Y; Ramklint M
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2021 Oct; 75(7):494-501. PubMed ID: 33969799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population.
    Norén P; Karlsson J; Ohlsson-Nevo E; Möller M; Hermansson L
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2023 Apr; 7(1):36. PubMed ID: 37020121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for validity of the Swedish self-rated 36-item version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in patients with mental disorders: a multi-centre cross-sectional study using Rasch analysis.
    Svanborg C; Amer A; Nordenskjöld A; Ramklint M; Söderberg P; Tungström S; Ginsberg Y; Hermansson L
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2022 May; 6(1):45. PubMed ID: 35526195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Yoruba version of the Beck Hopelessness Scale: psychometric characteristics and correlates of hopelessness in a sample of Nigerian psychiatric outpatients.
    Aloba O; Akinsulore A; Mapayi B; Oloniniyi I; Mosaku K; Alimi T; Esan O
    Compr Psychiatry; 2015 Jan; 56():258-71. PubMed ID: 25446724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the WHODAS 2.0 to Assess Functioning Among Veterans Seeking Compensation for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
    Marx BP; Wolf EJ; Cornette MM; Schnurr PP; Rosen MI; Friedman MJ; Keane TM; Speroff T
    Psychiatr Serv; 2015 Dec; 66(12):1312-7. PubMed ID: 26278226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the 12-item Self-administered World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in Patients with Schizophrenia.
    Wada R; Fujiwara M; Yamada Y; Nakaya N; Fujimori M; So R; Kodama M; Higuchi Y; Kakeda K; Uchitomi Y; Yamada N; Inagaki M
    Acta Med Okayama; 2021 Jun; 75(3):315-322. PubMed ID: 34176935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Support for the higher-order factor structure of the WHODAS 2.0 self-report version in a Dutch outpatient psychiatric setting.
    Williams GL; de Beurs E; Spinhoven P; Flens G; Paap MCS
    Qual Life Res; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2939-2949. PubMed ID: 34117613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Validity and Reliability of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in Turkish Psychiatry Patients and Healthy Controls].
    Aslan Kunt D; Dereboy F
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2018; 29(4):248-257. PubMed ID: 30887475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability - systematic review.
    Saltychev M; Katajapuu N; Bärlund E; Laimi K
    Disabil Rehabil; 2021 Mar; 43(6):789-794. PubMed ID: 31335215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the 36-item and 12-item self-report World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.
    Park SH; Demetriou EA; Pepper KL; Song YJC; Thomas EE; Hickie IB; Glozier N; Guastella AJ
    Autism Res; 2019 Jul; 12(7):1101-1111. PubMed ID: 31033250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Functioning across Common Mental Disorders in Psychiatric Emergency Patients: Results from the WHODAS-2.
    Hoehne A; Giguère CE; Herba CM; Labelle R
    Can J Psychiatry; 2021 Dec; 66(12):1085-1093. PubMed ID: 33353429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of Disability in Canadians with Mental Disorders Using an Abbreviated Version of a DSM-5 Emerging Measure: The 12-Item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0.
    Sjonnesen K; Bulloch AG; Williams J; Lavorato D; B Patten S
    Can J Psychiatry; 2016 Apr; 61(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 27254415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of patient ratings and staff ratings of disability using the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule in individuals with psychotic spectrum disorders who are forensic psychiatric inpatients.
    Källman MV; Hedlund-Lindberg M; Kristiansson M; Johansson AGM
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2024 Aug; 34(4):347-359. PubMed ID: 38824652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation with the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury.
    van der Zee CH; Post MW; Brinkhof MW; Wagenaar RC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 24008052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses.
    Chiu TY; Yen CF; Chou CH; Lin JD; Hwang AW; Liao HF; Chi WC
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2812-20. PubMed ID: 25094056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in people with severe mental disorders in rural Ethiopia.
    Habtamu K; Alem A; Medhin G; Fekadu A; Dewey M; Prince M; Hanlon C
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):64. PubMed ID: 28381230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Snell DL; Iverson GL; Panenka WJ; Silverberg ND
    J Neurotrauma; 2017 Dec; 34(23):3256-3261. PubMed ID: 28895491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.