These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35834195)
1. How survey scoring decisions can influence your study's results: A trip through the IRT looking glass. Soland J; Kuhfeld M; Edwards K Psychol Methods; 2024 Oct; 29(5):1003-1024. PubMed ID: 35834195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models. Rhemtulla M; van Bork R; Borsboom D Psychol Methods; 2020 Feb; 25(1):30-45. PubMed ID: 31169371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence That Selecting an Appropriate Item Response Theory-Based Approach to Scoring Surveys Can Help Avoid Biased Treatment Effect Estimates. Soland J Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Apr; 82(2):376-403. PubMed ID: 35185164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A causal theory of error scores. van Bork R; Rhemtulla M; Sijtsma K; Borsboom D Psychol Methods; 2024 Aug; 29(4):807-826. PubMed ID: 35878074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do simple slopes follow-up tests lead us astray? Advancements in the visualization and reporting of interactions. Finsaas MC; Goldstein BL Psychol Methods; 2021 Feb; 26(1):38-60. PubMed ID: 32309961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Autoregressive mediation models using composite scores and latent variables: Comparisons and recommendations. Zhang Q; Yang Y Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):472-495. PubMed ID: 32271042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 2): Applications and novel extensions. Henninger M; Meiser T Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):577-595. PubMed ID: 33017167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The measurement of the mediator and its influence on statistical mediation conclusions. Gonzalez O; MacKinnon DP Psychol Methods; 2021 Feb; 26(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 32175754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Avoiding bias from sum scores in growth estimates: An examination of IRT-based approaches to scoring longitudinal survey responses. Kuhfeld M; Soland J Psychol Methods; 2022 Apr; 27(2):234-260. PubMed ID: 33090818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 1): A model integration. Henninger M; Meiser T Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):560-576. PubMed ID: 33017166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Latent variable GIMME using model implied instrumental variables (MIIVs). Gates KM; Fisher ZF; Bollen KA Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):227-242. PubMed ID: 31246041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A cautionary tale on treating measurement error. Zhang Q Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):308-330. PubMed ID: 35604700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the assessment of measurement invariance: Using regularization to select anchor items and identify differential item functioning. Belzak WCM; Bauer DJ Psychol Methods; 2020 Dec; 25(6):673-690. PubMed ID: 31916799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The accuracy of reliability coefficients: A reanalysis of existing simulations. Cho E Psychol Methods; 2024 Apr; 29(2):331-349. PubMed ID: 35084890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A diagnostic procedure to detect departures from local independence in item response theory models. Edwards MC; Houts CR; Cai L Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):138-149. PubMed ID: 28368176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]