These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35834817)

  • 1. Indirect bonding: an in-vitro comparison of a Polyjet printed versus a conventional silicone transfer tray.
    Hofmann EC; Süpple J; von Glasenapp J; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Koch PJ
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Nov; 92(6):728-737. PubMed ID: 35834817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Two 3D-Printed Indirect Bonding (IDB) Tray Design Versions and Their Influence on the Transfer Accuracy.
    von Glasenapp J; Hofmann E; Süpple J; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Koch PJ
    J Clin Med; 2022 Feb; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 35268386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of indirect bonding trays - a measurement algorithm.
    Koch PJ; Albrecht M; Lin WC; Jost-Brinkmann PG
    Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Sep; 25(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 35072417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy evaluation of bracket repositioning by indirect bonding: hard acrylic CAD/CAM versus soft one-layer silicone trays, an in vitro study.
    Pottier T; Brient A; Turpin YL; Chauvel B; Meuric V; Sorel O; Brezulier D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Nov; 24(11):3889-3897. PubMed ID: 32236724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the transfer accuracy of two digital indirect bonding trays for labial bracket bonding.
    Niu Y; Zeng Y; Zhang Z; Xu W; Xiao L
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Jan; 91(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 33289807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of bracket position using thermoplastic and 3D-printed indirect bonding trays.
    Shin SH; Lee KJ; Kim SJ; Yu HS; Kim KM; Hwang CJ; Cha JY
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 34085499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accurate Bracket Placement with an Indirect Bonding Method Using Digitally Designed Transfer Models Printed in Different Orientations-An In Vitro Study.
    Süpple J; von Glasenapp J; Hofmann E; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Koch PJ
    J Clin Med; 2021 May; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 34066993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bracket transfer accuracy with two different three-dimensional printed transfer trays vs silicone transfer trays.
    Hoffmann L; Sabbagh H; Wichelhaus A; Kessler A
    Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):364-371. PubMed ID: 34982114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transfer Accuracy of Three Indirect Bonding Trays: An
    Gündoğ H; Arman Özçırpıcı A; Pamukçu H
    Turk J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 36(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 36960701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed bracket transfer tray using an in-office indirect bonding system.
    Yoo SH; Choi SH; Kim KM; Lee KJ; Kim YJ; Yu JH; Choi YI; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jul; 162(1):93-102.e1. PubMed ID: 35772876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transfer accuracy of 3D-printed trays for indirect bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Bachour PC; Klabunde R; Grünheid T
    Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):372-379. PubMed ID: 35006236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transfer accuracy of two indirect bonding techniques-an in vitro study with 3D scanned models.
    Schmid J; Brenner D; Recheis W; Hofer-Picout P; Brenner M; Crismani AG
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Sep; 40(5):549-555. PubMed ID: 29471483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linear and angular transfer accuracy of labial brackets using three dimensional-printed indirect bonding trays: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bakdach WMM; Hadad R
    Int Orthod; 2022 Mar; 20(1):100612. PubMed ID: 35144909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of bracket bonding between two CAD/CAM guided bonding devices: GBD-U vs GBD-B.
    Wang P; Li W; Li B; Han X; Bai D; Xue C
    J Dent; 2023 Apr; 131():104456. PubMed ID: 36849067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bracket Transfer Accuracy with the Indirect Bonding Technique-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Sabbagh H; Khazaei Y; Baumert U; Hoffmann L; Wichelhaus A; Janjic Rankovic M
    J Clin Med; 2022 May; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 35566695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reproducibility of digital indirect bonding technique using three-dimensional (3D) models and 3D-printed transfer trays.
    Duarte MEA; Gribel BF; Spitz A; Artese F; Miguel JAM
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):92-99. PubMed ID: 31411488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new method for successful indirect bonding in relation to bond strength.
    Wendl T; Bandl C; Kern W; Wendl B; Proff P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2022 Oct; 67(5):403-410. PubMed ID: 35998665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Bracket Failure Rate between Two Different Materials Used to Fabricate Transfer Trays for Indirect Orthodontic Bonding.
    Kulkarni NB; Goyal S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Mar; 23(3):307-312. PubMed ID: 35781435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays.
    Plattner J; Othman A; Arnold J; von See C
    Turk J Orthod; 2020; 33(4):232-238. PubMed ID: 33447466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3D Printing Pen: A Novel Adjunct for Indirect Bonding.
    Kulkarni NB; Goyal SM; Shah VD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Aug; 22(8):964-968. PubMed ID: 34753853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.