These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35834864)

  • 1. It's not what you did, it's what you could have done.
    Bernhard RM; LeBaron H; Phillips J
    Cognition; 2022 Nov; 228():105222. PubMed ID: 35834864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normality: Part descriptive, part prescriptive.
    Bear A; Knobe J
    Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():25-37. PubMed ID: 27842702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The paradox of moral focus.
    Young L; Phillips J
    Cognition; 2011 May; 119(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 21315324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The pervasive impact of ignorance.
    Kirfel L; Phillips J
    Cognition; 2023 Feb; 231():105316. PubMed ID: 36402085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive processes in imaginative moral shifts: How judgments of morally unacceptable actions change.
    Tepe B; Byrne RMJ
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):1103-1123. PubMed ID: 35532831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.
    Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173405. PubMed ID: 28278214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unifying morality's influence on non-moral judgments: The relevance of alternative possibilities.
    Phillips J; Luguri JB; Knobe J
    Cognition; 2015 Dec; 145():30-42. PubMed ID: 26298424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How social relationships shape moral wrongness judgments.
    Earp BD; McLoughlin KL; Monrad JT; Clark MS; Crockett MJ
    Nat Commun; 2021 Oct; 12(1):5776. PubMed ID: 34599174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How Much Is Enough? The Relationship Between Prosocial Effort and Moral Character Judgments.
    Berry Z; Lucas BJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2024 May; 50(5):659-678. PubMed ID: 36575959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moral hindsight for good actions and the effects of imagined alternatives to reality.
    Byrne RMJ; Timmons S
    Cognition; 2018 Sep; 178():82-91. PubMed ID: 29842988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immoral Professors and Malfunctioning Tools: Counterfactual Relevance Accounts Explain the Effect of Norm Violations on Causal Selection.
    Kominsky JF; Phillips J
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Nov; 43(11):e12792. PubMed ID: 31742757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the Neural and Cognitive Basis of Moral Luck: It's Not What You Do but What You Know.
    Young L; Nichols S; Saxe R
    Rev Philos Psychol; 2010 Sep; 1(3):333-349. PubMed ID: 22558062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When it's not easy to do the right thing: Developmental changes in understanding cost drive evaluations of moral praiseworthiness.
    Zhao X; Kushnir T
    Dev Sci; 2023 Jan; 26(1):e13257. PubMed ID: 35301779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive parallels between moral judgment and modal judgment.
    Shtulman A; Tong L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1327-35. PubMed ID: 23580365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are morally good actions ever free?
    Clark CJ; Shniderman A; Luguri JB; Baumeister RF; Ditto PH
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Aug; 63():161-182. PubMed ID: 29804874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2018 Feb; 22(1):32-70. PubMed ID: 28504021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How prescriptive norms influence causal inferences.
    Samland J; Waldmann MR
    Cognition; 2016 Nov; 156():164-176. PubMed ID: 27591550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ownership and convention.
    Nichols S; Thrasher J
    Cognition; 2023 Aug; 237():105454. PubMed ID: 37040670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can the Knobe Effect Be Explained Away? Methodological Controversies in the Study of the Relationship Between Intentionality and Morality.
    Cova F; Lantian A; Boudesseul J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1295-308. PubMed ID: 27424330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Moral judgements reflect default representations of possibility.
    Acierno J; Mischel S; Phillips J
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2022 Dec; 377(1866):20210341. PubMed ID: 36314154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.