266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35834972)
1. Efficient direct membrane filtration (DMF) of municipal wastewater for carbon recovery: Application of a simple pretreatment and selection of an appropriate membrane pore size.
Sugiyama T; Ito Y; Hafuka A; Kimura K
Water Res; 2022 Aug; 221():118810. PubMed ID: 35834972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Autopsy of high-pressure membranes to compare effectiveness of MF and UF pretreatment in water reclamation.
Kim J; DiGiano FA; Reardon RD
Water Res; 2008 Feb; 42(3):697-706. PubMed ID: 17961627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Direct membrane filtration (DMF) for recovery of organic matter in municipal wastewater using small amounts of chemicals and energy.
Kimura K; Yamakawa M; Hafuka A
Chemosphere; 2021 Aug; 277():130244. PubMed ID: 34384173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct Membrane Filtration of Municipal Wastewater: Studying the Most Suitable Conditions for Minimizing Fouling Rate in Commercial Porous Membranes at Demonstration Scale.
Sanchis-Perucho P; Aguado D; Ferrer J; Seco A; Robles Á
Membranes (Basel); 2023 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 36676906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct membrane filtration of municipal wastewater with chemically enhanced backwash for recovery of organic matter.
Lateef SK; Soh BZ; Kimura K
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Dec; 150():149-55. PubMed ID: 24161553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Smart ultrafiltration membrane fouling control as desalination pretreatment of shale gas fracturing wastewater: The effects of backwash water.
Chang H; Li T; Liu B; Chen C; He Q; Crittenden JC
Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104869. PubMed ID: 31228783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM).
Lee N; Amy G; Croué JP; Buisson H
Water Res; 2004 Dec; 38(20):4511-23. PubMed ID: 15556226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Removal characteristics of dissolved organic matter and membrane fouling in ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane combined processes treating the secondary effluent of wastewater treatment plant.
Liu J; Zhao M; Duan C; Yue P; Li T
Water Sci Technol; 2021 Feb; 83(3):689-700. PubMed ID: 33600372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biofilm rigidity, mechanics and composition in seawater desalination pretreatment employing ultrafiltration and microfiltration membranes.
Ranieri L; Esposito R; Nunes SP; Vrouwenvelder JS; Fortunato L
Water Res; 2024 Apr; 253():121282. PubMed ID: 38341976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of Ceramic Membranes in a Membrane Filtration Supported by Coagulation for the Treatment of Dairy Wastewater.
Zielińska M; Galik M
Water Air Soil Pollut; 2017; 228(5):173. PubMed ID: 28458404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The membrane fouling mechanisms of the PAC/BPAC-UF combined process used to treat the secondary effluent from municipal wastewater treatment plant.
Sun L; He N; Duan X; Yang B; Feng C; Zhang Y
Water Sci Technol; 2018 Jan; 77(1-2):211-219. PubMed ID: 29339620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study on membrane fouling between membrane-coupled moving bed biofilm reactor and conventional membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment.
Yang W; Syed W; Zhou H
Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(5):1021-7. PubMed ID: 24622551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reducing ultrafiltration membrane fouling during potable water reuse using pre-ozonation.
Wang H; Park M; Liang H; Wu S; Lopez IJ; Ji W; Li G; Snyder SA
Water Res; 2017 Nov; 125():42-51. PubMed ID: 28834767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrafiltration significantly increased the scaling potential of municipal secondary effluent on reverse osmosis membranes.
Tong X; Zhang ZW; Wu YH; Bai Y; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Hu HY
Water Res; 2022 Jul; 220():118672. PubMed ID: 35635920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The feasibility of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation: Comparison with ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor (UF-MBR)+RO process.
Tay MF; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
Water Res; 2018 Feb; 129():180-189. PubMed ID: 29149673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of a combined coagulation and disk filtration process as a pre-treatment to microfiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in a municipal wastewater pilot plant.
Chon K; Cho J; Kim SJ; Jang A
Chemosphere; 2014 Dec; 117():20-6. PubMed ID: 25433990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hybrid MF and membrane bioreactor process applied towards water and indigo reuse from denim textile wastewater.
Couto CF; Marques LS; Balmant J; de Oliveira Maia AP; Moravia WG; Santos Amaral MC
Environ Technol; 2018 Mar; 39(6):725-738. PubMed ID: 28338418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of mass retention of dissolved organic matter and membrane pore size on membrane fouling and flux decline.
Lin CF; Yu-Chen Lin A; Sri Chandana P; Tsai CY
Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):389-94. PubMed ID: 19013630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
