169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35835886)
1. Micro-ultrasound-guided biopsies versus systematic biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dariane C; Ploussard G; Barret E; Beauval JB; Brureau L; Créhange G; Fromont G; Gauthé M; Mathieu R; Renard-Penna R; Roubaud G; Ruffion A; Sargos P; Rouprêt M; Fiard G;
World J Urol; 2023 Mar; 41(3):641-651. PubMed ID: 35835886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is There Still a Need for Repeated Systematic Biopsies in Patients with Previous Negative Biopsies in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies of the Prostate?
Exterkate L; Wegelin O; Barentsz JO; van der Leest MG; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; van Melick HHE; Somford DM
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Apr; 3(2):216-223. PubMed ID: 31239236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naïve Men: A Meta-Analysis.
Tu X; Liu Z; Zhang C; Chang T; Xu H; Bao Y; Li J; Jin K; Yuan Q; Qiu S; Yang L; Wei Q
Urol Int; 2020; 104(3-4):187-198. PubMed ID: 31825927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The FUTURE Trial: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial on Target Biopsy Techniques Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies.
Wegelin O; Exterkate L; van der Leest M; Kummer JA; Vreuls W; de Bruin PC; Bosch JLHR; Barentsz JO; Somford DM; van Melick HHE
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):582-590. PubMed ID: 30522912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Novel sampling scheme with reduced cores in men with multiparametric MRI-visible lesions undergoing prostate biopsy.
Ruan M; Wang H; Li X; Song G
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Jun; 48(6):2139-2147. PubMed ID: 37036488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Additive Value of Transrectal Systematic Ventral Biopsies in Combination with Magnet Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy in Patients with 3 or More Negative Prostate Biopsies.
Maxeiner A; Nest AM; Stephan C; Cash H; Baur ADJ; Fischer T; Kilic E; Piper SK; Nowak CP; Busch J; Miller K; Mang J
Urol Int; 2020; 104(3-4):205-213. PubMed ID: 31801153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MRI-targeted or systematic random biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy naïve patients: follow-up of a PRECISION trial-like retrospective cohort.
Luzzago S; de Cobelli O; Mistretta FA; Piccinelli ML; Lorusso V; Morelli M; Bianchi R; Catellani M; Cozzi G; Di Trapani E; Pricolo P; Alessi S; Ferro M; Marvaso G; Matei DV; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Petralia G; Musi G
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2021 Jun; 24(2):406-413. PubMed ID: 32989259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection with various prostate sampling schemes based on different csPCa definitions.
Wang F; Chen T; Wang M; Chen H; Wang C; Liu P; Liu S; Luo J; Ma Q; Xu L
BMC Urol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):183. PubMed ID: 34949183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?
Wegelin O; van Melick HHE; Hooft L; Bosch JLHR; Reitsma HB; Barentsz JO; Somford DM
Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):517-531. PubMed ID: 27568655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer: diagnostic yield of modified transrectal ultrasound-guided twelve-core combined biopsy (targeted plus systematic biopsies) using prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging.
Song C; Park SY
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Oct; 46(10):4974-4983. PubMed ID: 34181040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can fewer transperineal systematic biopsy cores have the same prostate cancer detection rate as of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy?
Liu H; Ruan M; Wang H; Wang H; Li X; Song G
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Dec; 23(4):589-595. PubMed ID: 32719353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic performance of MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsies vs. systematic prostate biopsies in biopsy-naïve, previous negative biopsy patients and men undergoing active surveillance.
Borghesi M; Bianchi L; Barbaresi U; Vagnoni V; Corcioni B; Gaudiano C; Fiorentino M; Giunchi F; Chessa F; Garofalo M; Bertaccini A; Angelini S; Ercolino A; Casablanca C; Droghetti M; Golfieri R; Schiavina R
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Jun; 73(3):357-366. PubMed ID: 33769008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current role of systematic biopsy in diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in primary combined MRI-targeted biopsy: a high-volume single-center study.
Krausewitz P; Fostitsch D; Weiten R; Kluemper N; Stein J; Luetkens J; Kristiansen G; Ellinger J; Ritter M
World J Urol; 2023 Jan; 41(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 36477403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reasons for missing clinically significant prostate cancer by targeted magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy.
Klingebiel M; Arsov C; Ullrich T; Quentin M; Al-Monajjed R; Mally D; Sawicki LM; Hiester A; Esposito I; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 137():109587. PubMed ID: 33592552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. mpMRI-targeted biopsy versus systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
Baccaglini W; Glina FPA; Pazeto CL; Bernardo WM; Sanchez-Salas R
Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Sep; 30(5):711-719. PubMed ID: 32732624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy techniques compared to transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bass EJ; Pantovic A; Connor MJ; Loeb S; Rastinehad AR; Winkler M; Gabe R; Ahmed HU
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2022 Feb; 25(2):174-179. PubMed ID: 34548624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significance of MRI/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Three-Dimensional Model-Guided, Targeted Biopsy Based on Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Tang Y; Liu Z; Tang L; Zhang R; Lu Y; Liang J; Zou Z; Zhou C; Wang Y
Urol Int; 2018; 100(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 29084410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of systematic prostate biopsies when performing transperineal MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy with needle tracking-what is the additional value?
Günzel K; Magheli A; Busch J; Baco E; Cash H; Heinrich S; Edler D; Schostak M; Borgmann H; Schlegel J; Hinz S
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Oct; 54(10):2477-2483. PubMed ID: 35877030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
