141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35836388)
21. Use of count-based image reconstruction to evaluate the variability and repeatability of measured standardised uptake values.
Kaneta T; Daisaki H; Ogawa M; Liu ET; Iizuka H; Arisawa T; Hino-Shishikura A; Yoshida K; Inoue T
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192549. PubMed ID: 29432459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Test-Retest Reproducibility of
Kurland BF; Peterson LM; Shields AT; Lee JH; Byrd DW; Novakova-Jiresova A; Muzi M; Specht JM; Mankoff DA; Linden HM; Kinahan PE
J Nucl Med; 2019 May; 60(5):608-614. PubMed ID: 30361381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Standardization of [F-18]FDG PET/CT for response evaluation by the Radiologic Society of North America-Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (RSNA-QIBA) profile: preliminary results from the Japan-QIBA (J-QIBA) activities for Asian international multicenter phase II trial.
Bae H; Tsuchiya J; Okamoto T; Ito I; Sonehara Y; Nagahama F; Kubota K; Tateishi U
Jpn J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):686-690. PubMed ID: 30251115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A novel approach for quantitative harmonization in PET.
Namías M; Bradshaw T; Menezes VO; Machado MAD; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(9):095019. PubMed ID: 29726406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Multicenter study of quantitative PET system harmonization using NIST-traceable
Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Iimori T; Sawada K; Kamiya T; Sakurai M; Miyaji N; Murata T; Sato E
Phys Med; 2018 Aug; 52():98-103. PubMed ID: 30139617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of image quality between step-and-shoot and continuous bed motion techniques in whole-body
Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Nakaichi T; Yoneyama T; Yokoyama K
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Nov; 31(9):686-695. PubMed ID: 28815414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optimizing positron emission tomography image acquisition protocols in integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.
Hartung-Knemeyer V; Beiderwellen KJ; Buchbender C; Kuehl H; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Poeppel TD
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 23399811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Protocols for Harmonized Quantification and Noise Reduction in Low-Dose Oncologic
Machado MAD; Menezes VO; Namías M; Vieira NS; Queiroz CC; Matheoud R; Alessio AM; Oliveira ML
J Nucl Med Technol; 2019 Mar; 47(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 30076252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A data-driven respiratory motion estimation approach for PET based on time-of-flight weighted positron emission particle tracking.
Tumpa TR; Acuff SN; Gregor J; Lee S; Hu D; Osborne DR
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1131-1143. PubMed ID: 33226647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Digital Reference Object to Analyze Calculation Accuracy of PET Standardized Uptake Value.
Pierce LA; Elston BF; Clunie DA; Nelson D; Kinahan PE
Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):538-45. PubMed ID: 25989387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Correlation of simultaneously acquired diffusion-weighted imaging and 2-deoxy-[18F] fluoro-2-D-glucose positron emission tomography of pulmonary lesions in a dedicated whole-body magnetic resonance/positron emission tomography system.
Schmidt H; Brendle C; Schraml C; Martirosian P; Bezrukov I; Hetzel J; Müller M; Sauter A; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer NF
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 23519008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preclinical evaluation of MR attenuation correction versus CT attenuation correction on a sequential whole-body MR/PET scanner.
Bini J; Izquierdo-Garcia D; Mateo J; Machac J; Narula J; Fuster V; Fayad ZA
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):313-22. PubMed ID: 23296082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of scanner harmonization on PET-based treatment response assessment in metastatic melanoma.
Weisman AJ; Bradshaw TJ; Namias M; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(22):225003. PubMed ID: 32906111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Noise considerations for PET quantification using maximum and peak standardized uptake value.
Lodge MA; Chaudhry MA; Wahl RL
J Nucl Med; 2012 Jul; 53(7):1041-7. PubMed ID: 22627001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Variability of lesion detectability and standardized uptake value according to the acquisition procedure and reconstruction among five PET scanners.
Takahashi Y; Oriuchi N; Otake H; Endo K; Murase K
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jul; 22(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 18670864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Standardization of Preclinical PET/CT Imaging to Improve Quantitative Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility: A Multicenter Study.
McDougald W; Vanhove C; Lehnert A; Lewellen B; Wright J; Mingarelli M; Corral CA; Schneider JE; Plein S; Newby DE; Welch A; Miyaoka R; Vandenberghe S; Tavares AAS
J Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 61(3):461-468. PubMed ID: 31562220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Are lesion features reproducible between
Constantino CS; Oliveira FPM; Silva M; Oliveira C; Castanheira JC; Silva Â; Vaz SC; Vieira P; Costa DC
Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):3071-3079. PubMed ID: 33125562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Standardized uptake value-based evaluations of solitary pulmonary nodules using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/computed tomography.
Degirmenci B; Wilson D; Laymon CM; Becker C; Mason NS; Bencherif B; Agarwal A; Luketich J; Landreneau R; Avril N
Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Jul; 29(7):614-22. PubMed ID: 18528183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Clinical and Experimental Comparison of Time of Flight PET/MRI and PET/CT Systems.
Oprea-Lager DE; Yaqub M; Pieters IC; Reinhard R; van Moorselaar RJ; van den Eertwegh AJ; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Mol Imaging Biol; 2015 Oct; 17(5):714-25. PubMed ID: 25690949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Standardized Uptake Values of
Tlostanova MS; Chipiga LA
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med; 2021; 13(3):15-23. PubMed ID: 34603751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
