These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3583739)

  • 21. Cancer in the offspring of radiation workers: a record linkage study.
    Draper GJ; Little MP; Sorahan T; Kinlen LJ; Bunch KJ; Conquest AJ; Kendall GM; Kneale GW; Lancashire RJ; Muirhead CR; O'Connor CM; Vincent TJ
    BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7117):1181-8. PubMed ID: 9393219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Increase in Animal Mortality Risk following Exposure to Sparsely Ionizing Radiation Is Not Linear Quadratic with Dose.
    Haley BM; Paunesku T; Grdina DJ; Woloschak GE
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0140989. PubMed ID: 26649569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Risk assessment and risk evaluation. On the effect of small radiation doses].
    Kellerer AM
    Med Klin (Munich); 1991 Feb; 86(2):109-11. PubMed ID: 2030659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dose response and temporal patterns of radiation-associated solid cancer risks.
    Preston DL; Pierce DA; Shimizu Y; Ron E; Mabuchi K
    Health Phys; 2003 Jul; 85(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12852470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Features of radiation carcinogenesis in man at low doses and low dose rates].
    Keirim-Markus IB
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 1998; 38(5):672-83. PubMed ID: 9876491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Risk of cancer after intake of uranium].
    Jensen PH; Søgaard-Hansen J; Ulbak K
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Mar; 163(10):1411-7. PubMed ID: 11257748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The new dose estimates for Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the consequences for those survivors exposed to low doses].
    Kellerer AM
    Strahlenschutz Forsch Prax; 1985; 25():2-22. PubMed ID: 3966249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. BEIR V report. Experts urge cautious interpretation of higher risk estimates.
    Tilyou SM
    J Nucl Med; 1990 Apr; 31(4):13A-19A. PubMed ID: 2324815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Carcinogenic effect of ionizing radiations in small doses].
    Moskalev IuI; Strel'tsova VN
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1986 May; 31(5):63-71. PubMed ID: 3520210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantifying radiation risks.
    Smith H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 1999; 86(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 11543394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Updated analyses of combined mortality data for workers at the Hanford Site, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Rocky Flats Weapons Plant.
    Gilbert ES; Cragle DL; Wiggs LD
    Radiat Res; 1993 Dec; 136(3):408-21. PubMed ID: 8278584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Alternatives to the BEIR relative risk model for explaining atomic-bomb survivor cancer mortality.
    Cohen BL
    Health Phys; 1987 Jan; 52(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 3804743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Novel approach to analyzing the carcinogenic effect of ionizing radiations.
    Gregoire O; Cleland MR
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 Jan; 82(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 16546899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Primary prevention in medical surveillance of workers exposed to ionizing radiations: personalized dose limit].
    Malesani F
    Med Lav; 2007; 98(5):381-406. PubMed ID: 17907532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Health risks due to radiation exposure].
    Jung H
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 7881092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The linear nonthreshold (LNT) model as used in radiation protection: an NCRP update.
    Boice JD
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Oct; 93(10):1079-1092. PubMed ID: 28532210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ionizing radiation and cancer risk: evidence from epidemiology.
    Ron E
    Radiat Res; 1998 Nov; 150(5 Suppl):S30-41. PubMed ID: 9806607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiation dose and leukemia risk in patients treated for cancer of the cervix.
    Boice JD; Blettner M; Kleinerman RA; Stovall M; Moloney WC; Engholm G; Austin DF; Bosch A; Cookfair DL; Krementz ET; Latourette HB; Peters LJ; Schulz MD; Lundell M; Pettersson F; Storm HH; Bell CM; Coleman MP; Fraser P; Palmer M; Prior P; Choi NW; Hislop TG; Koch M; Robb D; Robson D; Spengler RF; von Fournier D; Frischkorn R; Lochmüller H; Pompe-Kirn V; Rimpela A; Kjørstad K; Pejovic MH; Sigurdsson K; Pisani P; Kucera H; Hutchison GB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1987 Dec; 79(6):1295-311. PubMed ID: 3480381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Corrections in the atomic bomb data to examine low dose risk.
    Baker GS; Hoel DG
    Health Phys; 2003 Dec; 85(6):709-20. PubMed ID: 14626322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Studies of the mortality of A-bomb survivors, report 7. Part III. incidence of cancer in 1959-1978, based on the tumor registry, Nagasaki.
    Wakabayashi T; Kato H; Ikeda T; Schull WJ
    Radiat Res; 1983 Jan; 93(1):112-46. PubMed ID: 6823504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.