296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35838056)
1. A multi-modality physical phantom for mimicking tumor heterogeneity patterns in PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Valladares A; Beyer T; Papp L; Salomon E; Rausch I
Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 49(9):5819-5829. PubMed ID: 35838056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design and evaluation of a modular multimodality imaging phantom to simulate heterogeneous uptake and enhancement patterns for radiomic quantification in hybrid imaging: A feasibility study.
Kalisvaart GM; van Velden FHP; Hernández-Girón I; Meijer KM; Ghesquiere-Dierickx LMH; Brink WM; Webb A; de Geus-Oei LF; Slump CH; Kuznetsov DV; Schaart DR; Grootjans W
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3093-3106. PubMed ID: 35178781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeatability of
Pfaehler E; Beukinga RJ; de Jong JR; Slart RHJA; Slump CH; Dierckx RAJO; Boellaard R
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 30506687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interchangeability of radiomic features between [18F]-FDG PET/CT and [18F]-FDG PET/MR.
Vuong D; Tanadini-Lang S; Huellner MW; Veit-Haibach P; Unkelbach J; Andratschke N; Kraft J; Guckenberger M; Bogowicz M
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1677-1685. PubMed ID: 30714158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of image reconstruction settings on 18F-FDG PET radiomic features: multi-scanner phantom and patient studies.
Shiri I; Rahmim A; Ghaffarian P; Geramifar P; Abdollahi H; Bitarafan-Rajabi A
Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4498-4509. PubMed ID: 28567548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physical imaging phantoms for simulation of tumor heterogeneity in PET, CT, and MRI: An overview of existing designs.
Valladares A; Beyer T; Rausch I
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):2023-2037. PubMed ID: 31981214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of reproducible radiomic features from on-board volumetric images: A multi-institutional phantom study.
Adachi T; Nakamura M; Iramina H; Matsumoto K; Ishihara Y; Tachibana H; Kurokawa S; Cho S; Tanaka K; Fukumoto K; Nishiyama T; Kito S; Mizowaki T
Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5585-5596. PubMed ID: 36932977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Beads phantom for evaluating heterogeneity of SUV on
Okuda K; Saito H; Yamashita S; Yamamoto H; Ichikawa H; Kato T; Yokoyama K; Doai M; Hashimoto M; Matoba M
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 May; 36(5):495-503. PubMed ID: 35377093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical Analysis on Impact of Image Preprocessing of CT Texture Patterns and Its CT Radiomic Feature Stability: A Phantom Study.
Palani D; Ganesh KM; Karunagaran L; Govindaraj K; Shanmugam S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2023 Jun; 24(6):2061-2072. PubMed ID: 37378937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features produced by the fan-beam kV-CT on a novel ring gantry-based PET/CT linear accelerator.
Ketcherside T; Shi C; Chen Q; Leung D; Sundquist A; Huntzinger C; Court LE; Han C; Watkins T; Ladbury C; Williams TM; Liu A
Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 50(6):3719-3725. PubMed ID: 36995245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated computer quantification of breast cancer in small-animal models using PET-guided MR image co-segmentation.
Bagci U; Kramer-Marek G; Mollura DJ
EJNMMI Res; 2013 Jul; 3(1):49. PubMed ID: 23829944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiac SPECT radiomic features repeatability and reproducibility: A multi-scanner phantom study.
Edalat-Javid M; Shiri I; Hajianfar G; Abdollahi H; Arabi H; Oveisi N; Javadian M; Shamsaei Zafarghandi M; Malek H; Bitarafan-Rajabi A; Oveisi M; Zaidi H
J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 28(6):2730-2744. PubMed ID: 32333282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of Image Processing on Radiomic Features From Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Wichtmann BD; Harder FN; Weiss K; Schönberg SO; Attenberger UI; Alkadhi H; Pinto Dos Santos D; Baeßler B
Invest Radiol; 2023 Mar; 58(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 36070524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability of
Crandall JP; Fraum TJ; Lee M; Jiang L; Grigsby P; Wahl RL
J Nucl Med; 2021 May; 62(5):707-715. PubMed ID: 33008931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. PET/MRI and PET/CT Radiomics in Primary Cervical Cancer: A Pilot Study on the Correlation of Pelvic PET, MRI, and CT Derived Image Features.
Esfahani SA; Torrado-Carvajal A; Amorim BJ; Groshar D; Domachevsky L; Bernstine H; Stein D; Gervais D; Catalano OA
Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):60-69. PubMed ID: 34622425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of different reconstruction algorithms and setting parameters on radiomics features of PSMA PET images: A preliminary study.
Fooladi M; Soleymani Y; Rahmim A; Farzanefar S; Aghahosseini F; Seyyedi N; Sh Zadeh P
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Mar; 172():111349. PubMed ID: 38310673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of dedicated breast positron emission tomography and whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography images: a common phantom study.
Satoh Y; Motosugi U; Imai M; Onishi H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Feb; 34(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 31768819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Parameters Influencing PET Imaging Features: A Phantom Study with Irregular and Heterogeneous Synthetic Lesions.
Gallivanone F; Interlenghi M; D'Ambrosio D; Trifirò G; Castiglioni I
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():5324517. PubMed ID: 30275800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
