These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35838835)

  • 61. Attentional control and metacognitive monitoring of the effects of different types of task-irrelevant sound on serial recall.
    Kattner F; Bryce D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Feb; 48(2):139-158. PubMed ID: 34968110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Investigating memory reactivity with a within-participant manipulation of judgments of learning: support for the cue-strengthening hypothesis.
    Rivers ML; Janes JL; Dunlosky J
    Memory; 2021 Nov; 29(10):1342-1353. PubMed ID: 34635008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Caffeine cravings impair memory and metacognition.
    Palmer MA; Sauer JD; Ling A; Riza J
    Memory; 2017 Oct; 25(9):1225-1234. PubMed ID: 28276980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Neural correlates of judgments of learning - An ERP study on metacognition.
    Müller BCN; Tsalas NRH; van Schie HT; Meinhardt J; Proust J; Sodian B; Paulus M
    Brain Res; 2016 Dec; 1652():170-177. PubMed ID: 27720854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs.
    Tauber SK; Witherby AE; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1102-1119. PubMed ID: 30859406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Framing effects on metacognitive monitoring and control.
    Finn B
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Jun; 36(4):813-21. PubMed ID: 18604963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Framing cognitive offloading in terms of gains or losses: achieving a more optimal use of reminders.
    Fröscher L; Friedrich AK; Berentelg M; Widmer C; Gilbert SJ; Papenmeier F
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Jul; 7(1):61. PubMed ID: 35841428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Metamemory judgments have dissociable reactivity effects on item and interitem relational memory.
    Zhao W; Li J; Shanks DR; Li B; Hu X; Yang C; Luo L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):557-574. PubMed ID: 36848046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Individual differences in metacognition: evidence against a general metacognitive ability.
    Kelemen WL; Frost PJ; Weaver CA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jan; 28(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 10714142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A role for metamemory in cognitive offloading.
    Hu X; Luo L; Fleming SM
    Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():104012. PubMed ID: 31271925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Metacognitive control, serial position effects, and effective transfer to self-paced study.
    Murphy DH; Friedman MC; Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):144-159. PubMed ID: 34254273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
    Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Why do judgments of learning modify memory? Evidence from identical pairs and relatedness judgments.
    Halamish V; Undorf M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):547-556. PubMed ID: 36006723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: effects on monitoring and control.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Jun; 16(3):550-4. PubMed ID: 19451383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: the utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning.
    Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):429-37. PubMed ID: 18426071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Assessing prospective and retrospective metacognitive accuracy following traumatic brain injury remotely across cognitive domains.
    Bourke NJ; Trender W; Hampshire A; Lai H; Demarchi C; David M; Hellyer P; Sharp DJ; Friedland D
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2023 May; 33(4):574-591. PubMed ID: 35168480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The development of memory efficiency and value-directed remembering across the life span: a cross-sectional study of memory and selectivity.
    Castel AD; Humphreys KL; Lee SS; Galván A; Balota DA; McCabe DP
    Dev Psychol; 2011 Nov; 47(6):1553-64. PubMed ID: 21942664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. How do we forget negative events? The role of attentional, cognitive, and metacognitive control.
    Lee YS; Hsu YC
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 22894763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.
    Fitzgerald LM; Arvaneh M; Dockree PM
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():264-277. PubMed ID: 28222381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.