These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Magnetic resonance imaging-based deep learning model to predict multiple firings in double-stapled colorectal anastomosis. Cai ZH; Zhang Q; Fu ZW; Fingerhut A; Tan JW; Zang L; Dong F; Li SC; Wang SL; Ma JJ World J Gastroenterol; 2023 Jan; 29(3):536-548. PubMed ID: 36688017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Profiling Surgical Staplers: Does Staple Direction Affect the Strength of the Anastomosis. Kimura M; Takahashi H; Tanaka T; Sagawa H; Takeyama H Dig Surg; 2015; 32(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 26488286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of a circular powered stapler on preventing anastomotic leakage in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer: a retrospective study. Shibutani M; Fukuoka T; Iseki Y; Kasashima H; Kitayama K; Maeda K BMC Surg; 2023 Jul; 23(1):205. PubMed ID: 37464350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Does advancement in stapling technology with triple-row and enhanced staple configurations confer additional safety? A matched comparison of 340 stapled ileocolic anastomoses. Foo CC; Chiu AHO; Yip J; Law WL Surg Endosc; 2018 Jul; 32(7):3122-3130. PubMed ID: 29340808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection with Two Planned Stapler Fires. Otsuka K; Kimura T; Matsuo T; Fujii H; Yaegashi M; Sato K; Kondo S; Sasaki A JSLS; 2019; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 30914830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. New Anastomosis Technique to Prevent Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer, Especially Upper Rectal Cancer. Ando K; Kuriyama N; Fujimoto Y; Jogo T; Hokonohara K; Hu Q; Hisamatsu Y; Nakanishi R; Nakashima Y; Kimura Y; Oki E; Mori M In Vivo; 2020; 34(6):3533-3538. PubMed ID: 33144464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study. Vanstraelen S; Coosemans W; Depypere L; Mandeville Y; Moons J; Van Veer H; Nafteux P Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 36222069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Anastomotic complications after laparoscopic total gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy constructed by circular stapler (OrVil Kawamura H; Ohno Y; Ichikawa N; Yoshida T; Homma S; Takahashi M; Taketomi A Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5175-5182. PubMed ID: 28488177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis using the novel Chex(®) circular stapler: a case-control study. Maggiori L; Bretagnol F; Ferron M; Chevalier Y; Panis Y Colorectal Dis; 2011 Jun; 13(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 20184634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is Circular Fibrin Sealing of Low Rectal Anastomosis Able to Prevent Leakage in 21-Day Follow-up? Randomized Experimental Trial in Pigs. Wenger FA; Szucsik E; Hoinoiu BF; Cimpean AM; Matonick JP; Ionac M; Raica M Surg Innov; 2019 Aug; 26(4):408-419. PubMed ID: 31056009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating Performance of Circular Staplers Using Comparative Test Methods for Evidence-Based Surgery. Strassner H; Caulk A; Reher N; Petrescu S; Vasanji A Surg Innov; 2023 Oct; 30(5):576-585. PubMed ID: 37029908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of tissue compression on circular stapler line failure. Myers SR; Rothermel WS; Shaffer L Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep; 25(9):3043-9. PubMed ID: 21487874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of circular stapler size on anastomotic stricture formation in colorectal surgery: A propensity score matched study. Lee KY; Lee J; Park YY; Kim HJ; Oh ST PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0287595. PubMed ID: 37903104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Preventing complications in colorectal anastomosis: results of a randomized controlled trial using bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular stapler. Placer C; Enríquez-Navascués JM; Elorza G; Timoteo A; Mugica JA; Borda N; Saralegui Y; Elósegui JL Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Oct; 57(10):1195-201. PubMed ID: 25203376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Ito M; Sugito M; Kobayashi A; Nishizawa Y; Tsunoda Y; Saito N Int J Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jul; 23(7):703-7. PubMed ID: 18379795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts. Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Scatizzi M; Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2312-2323. PubMed ID: 37195782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of staple height and rectal-wall thickness on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection. Naoi D; Horie H; Sadatomo A; Koinuma K; Ota G; Oshiro K; Tahara M; Mori K; Ito H; Inoue Y; Homma Y; Mimura T; Lefor AK; Sata N Asian J Surg; 2023 Apr; 46(4):1577-1582. PubMed ID: 36216667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Technical characteristics can make the difference in a surgical linear stapler. Or not? Giaccaglia V; Antonelli MS; Addario Chieco P; Cocorullo G; Cavallini M; Gulotta G J Surg Res; 2015 Jul; 197(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 25918006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]