These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35839166)

  • 1. Explainability of Text Clustering Visualizations-Twitter Disinformation Case Study.
    Zarsky J; Lopez G; Kliegr T; Potel M
    IEEE Comput Graph Appl; 2022; 42(4):8-19. PubMed ID: 35839166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. #JunkScience: Investigating pseudoscience disinformation in the Russian Internet Research Agency tweets.
    Strudwicke IJ; Grant WJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jul; 29(5):459-472. PubMed ID: 32597365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of clustering and topic modeling methods over health-related tweets and emails.
    Lossio-Ventura JA; Gonzales S; Morzan J; Alatrista-Salas H; Hernandez-Boussard T; Bian J
    Artif Intell Med; 2021 Jul; 117():102096. PubMed ID: 34127235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying and Analyzing Health-Related Themes in Disinformation Shared by Conservative and Liberal Russian Trolls on Twitter.
    Karami A; Lundy M; Webb F; Turner-McGrievy G; McKeever BW; McKeever R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Feb; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33672122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating Italian disinformation spreading on Twitter in the context of 2019 European elections.
    Pierri F; Artoni A; Ceri S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227821. PubMed ID: 31951628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nursing Organizations' Health Policy Content on Facebook and Twitter Preceding the 2016 United States Presidential Election.
    Waddell A
    J Adv Nurs; 2019 Jan; 75(1):119-128. PubMed ID: 30109719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monitoring event-driven dynamics on Twitter: a case study in Belarus.
    Rice NM; Horne BD; Luther CA; Borycz JD; Allard SL; Ruck DJ; Fitzgerald M; Manaev O; Prins BC; Taylor M; Bentley RA
    SN Soc Sci; 2022; 2(4):36. PubMed ID: 35434643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protecting infrastructure performance from disinformation attacks.
    Jamalzadeh S; Barker K; González AD; Radhakrishnan S
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12707. PubMed ID: 35882902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic detection of influential actors in disinformation networks.
    Smith ST; Kao EK; Mackin ED; Shah DC; Simek O; Rubin DB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jan; 118(4):. PubMed ID: 33414276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Followback Clusters, Satellite Audiences, and Bridge Nodes: Coengagement Networks for the 2020 US Election.
    Beers A; Schafer JS; Kennedy I; Wack M; Spiro ES; Starbird K
    Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media; 2023; 17():59-71. PubMed ID: 38655460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trend analysis of COVID-19 mis/disinformation narratives-A 3-year study.
    Kotseva B; Vianini I; Nikolaidis N; Faggiani N; Potapova K; Gasparro C; Steiner Y; Scornavacche J; Jacquet G; Dragu V; Della Rocca L; Bucci S; Podavini A; Verile M; Macmillan C; Linge JP
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0291423. PubMed ID: 37976242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bots, disinformation, and the first impeachment of U.S. President Donald Trump.
    Rossetti M; Zaman T
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0283971. PubMed ID: 37155636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The limited reach of fake news on Twitter during 2019 European elections.
    Cinelli M; Cresci S; Galeazzi A; Quattrociocchi W; Tesconi M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234689. PubMed ID: 32555659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deepfakes, trolls and cybertroopers: how social media could sway elections in 2024.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2024 Feb; 626(7999):463-464. PubMed ID: 38297054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Like-minded sources on Facebook are prevalent but not polarizing.
    Nyhan B; Settle J; Thorson E; Wojcieszak M; Barberá P; Chen AY; Allcott H; Brown T; Crespo-Tenorio A; Dimmery D; Freelon D; Gentzkow M; González-Bailón S; Guess AM; Kennedy E; Kim YM; Lazer D; Malhotra N; Moehler D; Pan J; Thomas DR; Tromble R; Rivera CV; Wilkins A; Xiong B; de Jonge CK; Franco A; Mason W; Stroud NJ; Tucker JA
    Nature; 2023 Aug; 620(7972):137-144. PubMed ID: 37500978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterizing Twitter Discussions About HPV Vaccines Using Topic Modeling and Community Detection.
    Surian D; Nguyen DQ; Kennedy G; Johnson M; Coiera E; Dunn AG
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Aug; 18(8):e232. PubMed ID: 27573910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coordinating Narratives Framework for cross-platform analysis in the 2021 US Capitol riots.
    Ng LHX; Cruickshank IJ; Carley KM
    Comput Math Organ Theory; 2022 Nov; ():1-17. PubMed ID: 36440374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring relative opinion from location-based social media: A case study of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Gong Z; Cai T; Thill JC; Hale S; Graham M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233660. PubMed ID: 32442212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Creating COVID-19 Stigma by Referencing the Novel Coronavirus as the "Chinese virus" on Twitter: Quantitative Analysis of Social Media Data.
    Budhwani H; Sun R
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 May; 22(5):e19301. PubMed ID: 32343669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.