These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35839474)

  • 1. A Q-Q plot aids interpretation of the false discovery rate.
    Galwey NW
    Biom J; 2023 Jan; 65(1):e2100309. PubMed ID: 35839474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. False discovery rate control for multiple testing based on discrete p-values.
    Chen X
    Biom J; 2020 Jul; 62(4):1060-1079. PubMed ID: 31958180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new estimation of protein-level false discovery rate.
    Wu G; Wan X; Xu B
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(Suppl 6):567. PubMed ID: 30367581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modifying the false discovery rate procedure based on the information theory under arbitrary correlation structure and its performance in high-dimensional genomic data.
    Rastaghi S; Saki A; Tabesh H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):57. PubMed ID: 38317067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bon-EV: an improved multiple testing procedure for controlling false discovery rates.
    Li D; Xie Z; Zand M; Fogg T; Dye T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):1. PubMed ID: 28049414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A general method for accurate estimation of false discovery rates in identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Tan YD; Xu H
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jul; 30(14):2018-25. PubMed ID: 24632499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple testing with discrete data: Proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures.
    Chen X; Doerge RW; Heyse JF
    Biom J; 2018 Jul; 60(4):761-779. PubMed ID: 29748972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paradoxical results of adaptive false discovery rate procedures in neuroimaging studies.
    Reiss PT; Schwartzman A; Lu F; Huang L; Proal E
    Neuroimage; 2012 Dec; 63(4):1833-40. PubMed ID: 22842214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stratified false discovery control for large-scale hypothesis testing with application to genome-wide association studies.
    Sun L; Craiu RV; Paterson AD; Bull SB
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):519-30. PubMed ID: 16800000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. False discovery rate and permutation test: an evaluation in ERP data analysis.
    Lage-Castellanos A; Martínez-Montes E; Hernández-Cabrera JA; Galán L
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 19941298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. FDR control by the BH procedure for two-sided correlated tests with implications to gene expression data analysis.
    Reiner-Benaim A
    Biom J; 2007 Feb; 49(1):107-26. PubMed ID: 17342953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FastLSU: a more practical approach for the Benjamini-Hochberg FDR controlling procedure for huge-scale testing problems.
    Madar V; Batista S
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 32(11):1716-23. PubMed ID: 26826716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. POWER-ENHANCED MULTIPLE DECISION FUNCTIONS CONTROLLING FAMILY-WISE ERROR AND FALSE DISCOVERY RATES.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Ann Stat; 2011 Feb; 39(1):556-583. PubMed ID: 25018568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SLOPE-ADAPTIVE VARIABLE SELECTION VIA CONVEX OPTIMIZATION.
    Bogdan M; van den Berg E; Sabatti C; Su W; Candès EJ
    Ann Appl Stat; 2015; 9(3):1103-1140. PubMed ID: 26709357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of false discovery rate procedure to pairwise comparisons of refractive index of glass fragments.
    Pawluk-Kołc M; Zieba-Palus J; Parczewski A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 160(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16221535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classes of Multiple Decision Functions Strongly Controlling FWER and FDR.
    Peña EA; Habiger JD; Wu W
    Metrika; 2015 Jul; 78(5):563-595. PubMed ID: 26166847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Work efficiency: a new criterion for comprehensive comparison and evaluation of statistical methods in large-scale identification of differentially expressed genes.
    Tan YD
    Genomics; 2011 Nov; 98(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 21741470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally adaptive BH: A tiny but uniform improvement of the procedure of Benjamini and Hochberg.
    Solari A; Goeman JJ
    Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):776-780. PubMed ID: 27192178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-throughput DNA methylation datasets for evaluating false discovery rate methodologies.
    Asomaning N; Archer KJ
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2012 Jun; 56(6):1748-1756. PubMed ID: 22611297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An investigation on performance of Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) for the comparisons of several treatments with one control in the presence of small-variance genes.
    Lin D; Shkedy Z; Burzykowski T; Ion R; Göhlmann HW; Bondt AD; Perer T; Geerts T; Van den Wyngaert I; Bijnens L
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):801-23. PubMed ID: 18932139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.