These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35840438)

  • 1. Redirecting mandibular growth through orthodontic dentoalveolar height development in growing patients with Class III malocclusion undergoing maxillary orthopedic protraction.
    Loca-Apichai P; Jein-Wein Liou E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Oct; 162(4):510-519. PubMed ID: 35840438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment effects of occipitomental anchorage appliance of maxillary protraction combined with chincup traction in children with Class III malocclusion.
    Lin HC; Chang HP; Chang HF
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2007 May; 106(5):380-91. PubMed ID: 17561473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maxillofacial growth changes after maxillary protraction therapy in children with class III malocclusion: a dual control group retrospective study.
    Xu S; Liu Y; Hou Y; Li Y; Ge X; Wang L; Zhao L; Ma W
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):7. PubMed ID: 38172784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment response and long-term dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction.
    Ngan PW; Hagg U; Yiu C; Wei SH
    Semin Orthod; 1997 Dec; 3(4):255-64. PubMed ID: 9573887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combined rapid maxillary expansion and protraction facemask in the treatment of Class III malocclusions in growing children: a prospective long-term study.
    Williams MD; Sarver DM; Sadowsky PL; Bradley E
    Semin Orthod; 1997 Dec; 3(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 9573888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of shape correspondence analysis to quantify skeletal changes associated with bone-anchored Class III correction.
    Nguyen T; Cevidanes L; Paniagua B; Zhu H; Koerich L; De Clerck H
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 23886012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.
    Liu W; Zhou Y; Wang X; Liu D; Zhou S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):641-51. PubMed ID: 26432320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment.
    Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 8540481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.
    Macdonald KE; Kapust AJ; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction.
    Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):151-68. PubMed ID: 8670927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Lee SH; Koh SD; Chung DH; Lee JW; Lee SM
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 31750516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Maxillary features following protraction headgear therapy in skeletal Class III patients].
    Viteporn S; Mathurasai W
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1990; 40(4):148-56. PubMed ID: 2074327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protraction of the maxillofacial complex.
    Mermigos J; Full CA; Andreasen G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jul; 98(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 2363406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early treatment protocol for skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Oltramari-Navarro PV; de Almeida RR; Conti AC; Navarro Rde L; de Almeida MR; Fernandes LS
    Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 23780363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion combined with chincup protraction followed by fixed appliances.
    Palma JC; Tejedor-Sanz N; Oteo MD; Alarcón JA
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24892796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of onplants as stable anchorage for facemask treatment: a case report.
    Hong H; Ngan P; Han G; Qi LG; Wei SH
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):453-60. PubMed ID: 15898388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.