BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35840774)

  • 1. Machine learning-enabled quantitative ultrasound techniques for tissue differentiation.
    Thomson H; Yang S; Cochran S
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2022 Oct; 49(4):517-528. PubMed ID: 35840774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of methods for texture analysis of QUS parametric images in the characterization of breast lesions.
    Osapoetra LO; Chan W; Tran W; Kolios MC; Czarnota GJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244965. PubMed ID: 33382837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of Carotid Artery Plaque Components With Machine Learning Classification Using Homodyned-K Parametric Maps and Elastograms.
    Roy-Cardinal MH; Destrempes F; Soulez G; Cloutier G
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Mar; 66(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 29994706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional high-frequency backscatter and envelope quantification of cancerous human lymph nodes.
    Mamou J; Coron A; Oelze ML; Saegusa-Beecroft E; Hata M; Lee P; Machi J; Yanagihara E; Laugier P; Feleppa EJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Mar; 37(3):345-57. PubMed ID: 21316559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multimodality quantitative ultrasound envelope statistics imaging based support vector machines for characterizing tissue scatterer distribution patterns: Methods and application in detecting microwave-induced thermal lesions.
    Li S; Tsui PH; Wu W; Zhou Z; Wu S
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2024 May; 107():106910. PubMed ID: 38772312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved diagnostics through quantitative ultrasound imaging.
    Hruska DP; Sanchez J; Oelze ML
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():1956-9. PubMed ID: 19964021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative ultrasound assessment of breast tumor response to chemotherapy using a multi-parameter approach.
    Tadayyon H; Sannachi L; Gangeh M; Sadeghi-Naini A; Tran W; Trudeau ME; Pritchard K; Ghandi S; Verma S; Czarnota GJ
    Oncotarget; 2016 Jul; 7(29):45094-45111. PubMed ID: 27105515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unifying Concepts of Statistical and Spectral Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques.
    Destrempes F; Franceschini E; Yu FT; Cloutier G
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Feb; 35(2):488-500. PubMed ID: 26415165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ex vivo study of quantitative ultrasound parameters in fatty rabbit livers.
    Ghoshal G; Lavarello RJ; Kemmerer JP; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Dec; 38(12):2238-48. PubMed ID: 23062376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel coded excitation scheme to improve spatial and contrast resolution of quantitative ultrasound imaging.
    Sanchez JR; Pocci D; Oelze ML
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Oct; 56(10):2111-23. PubMed ID: 19942499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasound Homodyned-K Contrast-Weighted Summation Parametric Imaging Based on H-scan for Detecting Microwave Ablation Zones.
    Li S; Zhou Z; Wu S; Wu W
    Ultrason Imaging; 2023 May; 45(3):119-135. PubMed ID: 36995065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative ultrasound and machine learning for assessment of steatohepatitis in a rat model.
    Tang A; Destrempes F; Kazemirad S; Garcia-Duitama J; Nguyen BN; Cloutier G
    Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2175-2184. PubMed ID: 30560362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review of Quantitative Ultrasound: Envelope Statistics and Backscatter Coefficient Imaging and Contributions to Diagnostic Ultrasound.
    Oelze ML; Mamou J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 Feb; 63(2):336-51. PubMed ID: 26761606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Liver Fibrosis Assessment Using Radiomics of Ultrasound Homodyned-K imaging Based on the Artificial Neural Network Estimator.
    Zhou Z; Zhang Z; Gao A; Tai DI; Wu S; Tsui PH
    Ultrason Imaging; 2022 Nov; 44(5-6):229-241. PubMed ID: 36017590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deep Estimation of Speckle Statistics Parametric Images.
    Tehrani AKZ; Rosado-Mendez IM; Rivaz H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():3907-3910. PubMed ID: 36086035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The acoustic properties, centered on 20 MHZ, of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material and its temperature, frequency and age dependence.
    Brewin MP; Pike LC; Rowland DE; Birch MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1292-306. PubMed ID: 18343021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Homodyned K-Distribution Parameter Estimation in Quantitative Ultrasound: Autoencoder and Bayesian Neural Network Approaches.
    Tehrani AKZ; Cloutier G; Tang A; Rosado-Mendez IM; Rivaz H
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2024 Mar; 71(3):354-365. PubMed ID: 38252581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robust Scatterer Number Density Segmentation of Ultrasound Images.
    Tehrani AKZ; Rosado-Mendez IM; Rivaz H
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Apr; 69(4):1169-1180. PubMed ID: 35044911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In Vivo Quantitative Ultrasound on Dermis and Hypodermis for Classifying Lymphedema Severity in Humans.
    Omura M; Saito W; Akita S; Yoshida K; Yamaguchi T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):646-662. PubMed ID: 35033402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Size Polydispersity and Dense Media on Quantitative Ultrasound Estimates.
    Lombard O; Franceschini E
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2024 May; 71(5):572-583. PubMed ID: 38526898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.