These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3584167)

  • 21. Calculation of contraction stresses in dental composites by analysis of crack propagation in the matrix surrounding a cavity.
    Yamamoto T; Ferracane JL; Sakaguchi RL; Swain MV
    Dent Mater; 2009 Apr; 25(4):543-50. PubMed ID: 19100613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fracture toughness of posterior resin composites.
    Bonilla ED; Mardirossian G; Caputo AA
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 12066660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical strength of resin composite versus glass ceramic materials.
    Lohbauer U; Müller FA; Petschelt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 17628659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Subcritical crack growth and in vitro lifetime prediction of resin composites with different filler distributions.
    Ornaghi BP; Meier MM; Rosa V; Cesar PF; Lohbauer U; Braga RR
    Dent Mater; 2012 Sep; 28(9):985-95. PubMed ID: 22633684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fatigue of tooth-colored restoratives in aqueous environment.
    Kawakami Y; Takeshige F; Hayashi M; Ebisu S
    Dent Mater J; 2007 Jan; 26(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17410886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wear patterns and rates of posterior composite resins.
    Leinfelder KF
    Int Dent J; 1987 Sep; 37(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 3316043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
    Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fracture resistance of compomer and composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Chung SM; Chow WS; Tsai KT; Lim CT
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 14753329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of crack propagation in dental composites by optical coherence tomography.
    Braz AK; Kyotoku BB; Braz R; Gomes AS
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 18603290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Work of fracture of a composite resin: fracture-toughening mechanisms.
    Baudin C; Osorio R; Toledano M; de Aza S
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jun; 89(3):751-8. PubMed ID: 18465813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of placement of glass fibers and aramid fibers on the fracture resistance of provisional restorative materials.
    Saygili G; Sahmali SM; Demirel F
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 12540123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fracture resistance of anterior, posterior and universal light activated composite restoratives.
    Shortall AC; Uctasli S; Marquis PM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 11203782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microstructural characterization and fracture behavior of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite.
    Rodrigues SA; Scherrer SS; Ferracane JL; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1281-8. PubMed ID: 18374408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of glass fiber layering on the flexural strength of microfill and hybrid composites.
    Eronat N; Candan U; Türkün M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(3):171-8; discussion 179-81. PubMed ID: 19508260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contraction stresses in dental composites adjacent to and at the bonded interface as measured by crack analysis.
    Yamamoto T; Nishide A; Swain MV; Ferracane JL; Sakaguchi RL; Momoi Y
    Acta Biomater; 2011 Jan; 7(1):417-23. PubMed ID: 20691287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of short-term water storage on the elastic properties of some dental restorative materials--A resonant ultrasound spectroscopy study.
    Pastila P; Lassila LV; Jokinen M; Vuorinen J; Vallittu PK; Mäntylä T
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jul; 23(7):878-84. PubMed ID: 16949660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Strength and mode of failure of unidirectional and bidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composite materials.
    Chong KH; Chai J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 12737248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Immediate versus water-storage performance of Class V flowable composite restoratives.
    Irie M; Hatanaka K; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2006 Sep; 22(9):875-83. PubMed ID: 16837038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fracture toughness ov conventional or photopolymerized glass ionomer/dentin interfaces.
    Tam LE; Dev S; Pilliar RM
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(4):144-50. PubMed ID: 8700782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.