These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35841936)

  • 1. Change of the residual myometrial thickness during pregnancy in women who underwent laparoscopic niche resection compared with controls without niche surgery: a prospective comparative cohort study.
    Jordans IPM; Vissers J; de Leeuw RA; Hehenkamp WJK; Twisk JWR; de Groot CJM; Huirne JAF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Dec; 227(6):901.e1-901.e12. PubMed ID: 35841936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
    Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Kliucinskas M; Paskauskas S
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Mar; 58(3):. PubMed ID: 35334583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of laparoscopic niche resection versus expectant management in patients with unexplained infertility and a large uterine caesarean scar defect (uterine niche): protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the LAPRES study).
    Vissers J; Klein Meuleman SJM; de Leeuw RA; van Eekelen R; Groenman FA; Mol BW; Hehenkamp WJK; Huirne JAF
    BMJ Open; 2023 Jul; 13(7):e070950. PubMed ID: 37451732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic resection of symptomatic niches in uterine cesarean scars: Long-term follow-up on the prospective LAPNICHE study.
    Vissers J; Hehenkamp WJK; Brölmann HAM; Lambalk CB; Huirne JAF
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Dec; 102(12):1643-1652. PubMed ID: 37700545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transvaginal Sonographic Evaluation of Cesarean Section Scar Niche in Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
    Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Paskauskas S; Ramoniene G; Nadisauskiene RJ
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 34684128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hysteroscopic removal, with or without laparoscopic assistance, of first-trimester cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Chueh HY; Pai AH; Su YY; Hsu CC; Chang FY; Yen CF
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Mar; 117(3):643-645. PubMed ID: 35219475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].
    Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. First and Third Trimester Uterine Scar Thickness in Women With Previous Caesarean: A Prospective Comparative Study.
    Paquette K; Markey S; Roberge S; Girard M; Bujold E; Demers S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Jan; 41(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 30316720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Prediction and analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with cesarean scar diverticulum].
    Wang LL; Yang HX; Chen JY; Fan LX; Zhang XX
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Aug; 57(8):587-593. PubMed ID: 36008285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The clinical outcome of cesarean scar pregnancies implanted "on the scar" versus "in the niche".
    Kaelin Agten A; Cali G; Monteagudo A; Oviedo J; Ramos J; Timor-Tritsch I
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):510.e1-510.e6. PubMed ID: 28115056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gynecological and obstetrical outcomes after laparoscopic repair of a cesarean scar defect in a series of 38 women.
    Donnez O; Donnez J; Orellana R; Dolmans MM
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):289-296.e2. PubMed ID: 27816234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment thickness in parturients with previous scar in labor: a cross-sectional study.
    Alalaf SK; Mansour TMM; Sileem SA; Shabila NP
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 May; 22(1):409. PubMed ID: 35568830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New ultrasonographic risk assessment of uterine scar dehiscence in pregnancy after cesarean section.
    Kawakami K; Yoshizato T; Kurokawa Y; Okura N; Ushijima K
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2023 Jan; 50(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 36536061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic approach for a cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Karampelas S; Engels S; Birbarah C; Nisolle M
    Fertil Steril; 2022 May; 117(5):1099-1101. PubMed ID: 35361484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness, complications, and reproductive outcomes after cesarean scar pregnancy management: a retrospective cohort study.
    Verberkt C; Lemmers M; de Leeuw RA; van Mello NM; Groenman FA; Hehenkamp WJK; Huirne JAF
    AJOG Glob Rep; 2023 Feb; 3(1):100143. PubMed ID: 36691399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Novel laparoscopic surgery for the repair of cesarean scar defect without processing scar resection.
    Zhang NN; Wang GW; Zuo N; Yang Q
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Dec; 21(1):815. PubMed ID: 34879840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of purse-string uterine suture on scar healing after a cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Halouani A; Dimassi K; Ben Mansour A; Triki A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jul; 5(7):100992. PubMed ID: 37127211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saccone G; McCurdy R; Bujold E; Bifulco G; Berghella V
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28070914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pregnancy following cesarean scar defect (niche) repair: a cohort study.
    Goldenberg M; Timor I; Mashiach R; Cohen S; Sasson AM
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Nov; 306(5):1581-1586. PubMed ID: 35835918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cesarean scar thickness in non-pregnant women as a risk factor for uterine rupture.
    Risager JK; Uldbjerg N; Glavind J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jan; 35(2):389-394. PubMed ID: 31992102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.