These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35842195)

  • 1. A novel algorithm for comprehensive quality assessment of clinical magnetic resonance images based on natural scene statistics in spatial domain.
    Ikushima Y; Tokurei S; Tarewaki H; Morishita J; Yabuuchi H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Oct; 92():203-211. PubMed ID: 35842195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images.
    Chow LS; Rajagopal H; Paramesran R;
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):820-831. PubMed ID: 26969762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applicability Evaluation of Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment Methods for Computed Tomography Images.
    Ohashi K; Nagatani Y; Yoshigoe M; Iwai K; Tsuchiya K; Hino A; Kida Y; Yamazaki A; Ishida T
    J Digit Imaging; 2023 Dec; 36(6):2623-2634. PubMed ID: 37550519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modified-BRISQUE as no reference image quality assessment for structural MR images.
    Chow LS; Rajagopal H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Nov; 43():74-87. PubMed ID: 28716679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. No-reference image quality assessment of magnetic resonance images with high-boost filtering and local features.
    Oszust M; Piórkowski A; Obuchowicz R
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Sep; 84(3):1648-1660. PubMed ID: 32052485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [CT image quality assessment based on prior information of pre-restored images].
    Gao Q; Zhu M; Li D; Bian Z; Ma J
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2021 Feb; 41(2):230-237. PubMed ID: 33624596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Blind image quality assessment: from natural scene statistics to perceptual quality.
    Moorthy AK; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Dec; 20(12):3350-64. PubMed ID: 21521667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-SNR multiple T
    Eo T; Kim T; Jun Y; Lee H; Ahn SS; Kim DH; Hwang D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1835-1845. PubMed ID: 27635526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No-reference quality assessment for image-based assessment of economically important tropical woods.
    Rajagopal H; Mokhtar N; Tengku Mohmed Noor Izam TF; Wan Ahmad WK
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233320. PubMed ID: 32428043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of motion artifacts in brain magnetic resonance images using convolutional neural network-based prediction of full-reference image quality assessment metrics.
    Sagawa H; Itagaki K; Matsushita T; Miyati T
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2022 Jan; 9(1):015502. PubMed ID: 35106324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blind Deep S3D Image Quality Evaluation via Local to Global Feature Aggregation.
    Heeseok Oh ; Sewoong Ahn ; Jongyoo Kim ; Sanghoon Lee
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Oct; 26(10):4923-4936. PubMed ID: 28708557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Universal blind image quality assessment metrics via natural scene statistics and multiple kernel learning.
    Gao X; Gao F; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2013-26. PubMed ID: 24805219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image Quality and Geometric Distortion of Modern Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Sequences in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.
    Stocker D; Manoliu A; Becker AS; Barth BK; Nanz D; Klarhöfer M; Donati OF
    Invest Radiol; 2018 Apr; 53(4):200-206. PubMed ID: 29116960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. VSI: a visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment.
    Zhang L; Shen Y; Li H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Oct; 23(10):4270-81. PubMed ID: 25122572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prostate cancer: Comparison of 3D T2-weighted with conventional 2D T2-weighted imaging for image quality and tumor detection.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Neil J; Kong X; Melamed J; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Taouli B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):446-52. PubMed ID: 20093608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A consistency evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio in the quality assessment of human brain magnetic resonance images.
    Yu S; Dai G; Wang Z; Li L; Wei X; Xie Y
    BMC Med Imaging; 2018 May; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 29769079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application-Driven No-Reference Quality Assessment for Dermoscopy Images With Multiple Distortions.
    Xie F; Lu Y; Bovik AC; Jiang Z; Meng R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Jun; 63(6):1248-56. PubMed ID: 26513774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NITS-IQA Database: A New Image Quality Assessment Database.
    Ruikar J; Chaudhury S
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on an Optimal Linear Combination of Quality Measures Selected by Simulated Annealing.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2022 Aug; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 36005467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interobserver variability in quality assessment of magnetic resonance images.
    Obuchowicz R; Oszust M; Piorkowski A
    BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Sep; 20(1):109. PubMed ID: 32962651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.