BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35842636)

  • 1. Assessment of dose perturbations for metal stent in photon and proton radiotherapy plans for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Lee B; Cho S; Park HC; Kang SW; Kim JS; Chung JB
    Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jul; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 35842636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
    Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
    Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of common dental fixtures on treatment planning and delivery for head and neck intensity modulated proton therapy.
    Hu YH; Seum WCTH; Hunzeker A; Muller O; Foote RL; Mundy DW
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 24(7):e13973. PubMed ID: 36972299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TriB-RT: Simultaneous optimization of photon, electron and proton beams.
    Kueng R; Mueller S; Loebner HA; Frei D; Volken W; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MFM; Fix MK; Manser P
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(4):045006. PubMed ID: 32413883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
    Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetric study of uniform scanning proton therapy planning for prostate cancer patients with a metal hip prosthesis, and comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
    Rana S; Cheng C; Zheng Y; Hsi W; Zeidan O; Schreuder N; Vargas C; Larson G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 May; 15(3):4611. PubMed ID: 24892333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
    Rana S; Zheng Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of non-standard CT conversion ramps for Monte Carlo verification of 6 MV prostate IMRT plans.
    Zarza-Moreno M; Cardoso I; Teixeira N; Jesus AP; Mora G
    Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 22677401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy.
    Shirey RJ; Wu HT
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dosimetric impact of random spot positioning errors in intensity modulated proton therapy plans of small and large volume tumors.
    Arjunan M; Krishnan G; Sharma DS; M P N; Patro KC; Thiyagarajan R; Srinivas C; Jalali R
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20201031. PubMed ID: 33529057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of TPS calculation algorithms on dose delivered to the patient in proton therapy treatments.
    Molinelli S; Russo S; Magro G; Maestri D; Mairani A; Mastella E; Mirandola A; Vai A; Vischioni B; Valvo F; Ciocca M
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(7):075016. PubMed ID: 30802887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comprehensive dosimetric study of Monte Carlo and pencil-beam algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy for breast cancer.
    Liang X; Li Z; Zheng D; Bradley JA; Rutenberg M; Mendenhall N
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 30488548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
    Fracchiolla F; Engwall E; Janson M; Tamm F; Lorentini S; Fellin F; Bertolini M; Algranati C; Righetto R; Farace P; Amichetti M; Schwarz M
    Phys Med; 2021 Aug; 88():226-234. PubMed ID: 34311160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical note: Evaluation and second check of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine for small-field apertures in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
    Holmes J; Shen J; Shan J; Patrick CL; Wong WW; Foote RL; Patel SH; Bues M; Liu W
    Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3497-3506. PubMed ID: 35305269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
    Kurz C; Landry G; Resch AF; Dedes G; Kamp F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Raaymakers BW; Parodi K
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8470-8482. PubMed ID: 29047455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In silico comparison of the dosimetric impacts of a greater omentum spacer for abdominal and pelvic tumors in carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy.
    Yamada M; Sato H; Ieko Y; Miyasaka Y; Kanai T; Yano N; Ono T; Akamatsu H; Harada M; Ichikawa M; Teranishi Y; Kikuchi Y; Nemoto K
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Nov; 14(1):207. PubMed ID: 31752932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical Note: Clinical modeling and validation of breast tissue expander metallic ports in a commercial treatment planning system for proton therapy.
    Kang Y; Shen J; Bues M; Hu Y; Liu W; Ding X
    Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7512-7525. PubMed ID: 34519357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.