These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35842728)
1. Dataset of fitness trackers and smartwatches to measuring physical activity in research. Henriksen A; Woldaregay AZ; Muzny M; Hartvigsen G; Hopstock LA; Grimsgaard S BMC Res Notes; 2022 Jul; 15(1):258. PubMed ID: 35842728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables. Henriksen A; Haugen Mikalsen M; Woldaregay AZ; Muzny M; Hartvigsen G; Hopstock LA; Grimsgaard S J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e110. PubMed ID: 29567635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Wearable Technologies in Health Research: Scoping Review. Huhn S; Axt M; Gunga HC; Maggioni MA; Munga S; Obor D; Sié A; Boudo V; Bunker A; Sauerborn R; Bärnighausen T; Barteit S JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2022 Jan; 10(1):e34384. PubMed ID: 35076409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study. Nelson BW; Allen NB JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Mar; 7(3):e10828. PubMed ID: 30855232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Wrist-Worn Wearables for Monitoring Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure While Sitting or Performing Light-to-Vigorous Physical Activity: Validation Study. Düking P; Giessing L; Frenkel MO; Koehler K; Holmberg HC; Sperlich B JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 May; 8(5):e16716. PubMed ID: 32374274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review. Fuller D; Colwell E; Low J; Orychock K; Tobin MA; Simango B; Buote R; Van Heerden D; Luan H; Cullen K; Slade L; Taylor NGA JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Sep; 8(9):e18694. PubMed ID: 32897239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of Optical Heart Rate Sensing Technology in Wearable Fitness Trackers for Young and Older Adults: Validation and Comparison Study. Chow HW; Yang CC JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Apr; 8(4):e14707. PubMed ID: 32343255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Parental Perspectives of a Wearable Activity Tracker for Children Younger Than 13 Years: Acceptability and Usability Study. Mackintosh KA; Chappel SE; Salmon J; Timperio A; Ball K; Brown H; Macfarlane S; Ridgers ND JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Nov; 7(11):e13858. PubMed ID: 31682585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wearing the Future-Wearables to Empower Users to Take Greater Responsibility for Their Health and Care: Scoping Review. Kang HS; Exworthy M JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2022 Jul; 10(7):e35684. PubMed ID: 35830222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reporting adherence, validity and physical activity measures of wearable activity trackers in medical research: A systematic review. Chan A; Chan D; Lee H; Ng CC; Yeo AHL Int J Med Inform; 2022 Apr; 160():104696. PubMed ID: 35121356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and Acceptability of Wrist-Wearable Activity-Tracking Devices: Systematic Review of the Literature. Germini F; Noronha N; Borg Debono V; Abraham Philip B; Pete D; Navarro T; Keepanasseril A; Parpia S; de Wit K; Iorio A J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e30791. PubMed ID: 35060915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Combination of Indoor Localization and Wearable Sensor-Based Physical Activity Recognition to Assess Older Patients Undergoing Subacute Rehabilitation: Baseline Study Results. Ramezani R; Zhang W; Xie Z; Shen J; Elashoff D; Roberts P; Stanton A; Eslami M; Wenger N; Sarrafzadeh M; Naeim A JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jul; 7(7):e14090. PubMed ID: 31293244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Habit Formation in Wearable Activity Tracker Use Among Older Adults: Qualitative Study. Peng W; Li L; Kononova A; Cotten S; Kamp K; Bowen M JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e22488. PubMed ID: 33464216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recommendations for Identifying Valid Wear for Consumer-Level Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers and Acceptability of Extended Device Deployment in Children. Wing D; Godino JG; Baker FC; Yang R; Chevance G; Thompson WK; Reuter C; Bartsch H; Wilbur A; Straub LK; Castro N; Higgins M; Colrain IM; de Zambotti M; Wade NE; Lisdahl KM; Squeglia LM; Ortigara J; Fuemmeler B; Patrick K; Mason MJ; Tapert SF; Bagot KS Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 36501894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Behavior Change Techniques in Wrist-Worn Wearables to Promote Physical Activity: Content Analysis. Düking P; Tafler M; Wallmann-Sperlich B; Sperlich B; Kleih S JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Nov; 8(11):e20820. PubMed ID: 33211023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rationale and design of a large population study to validate software for the assessment of atrial fibrillation from data acquired by a consumer tracker or smartwatch: The Fitbit heart study. Lubitz SA; Faranesh AZ; Atlas SJ; McManus DD; Singer DE; Pagoto S; Pantelopoulos A; Foulkes AS Am Heart J; 2021 Aug; 238():16-26. PubMed ID: 33865810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]