142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35843202)
1. Model-based evaluation and model-free strategy for process development of three-column periodic counter-current chromatography.
Sun YN; Shi C; Zhong XZ; Chen XJ; Chen R; Zhang QL; Yao SJ; Jungbauer A; Lin DQ
J Chromatogr A; 2022 Aug; 1677():463311. PubMed ID: 35843202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Process development and optimization of continuous capture with three-column periodic counter-current chromatography.
Shi C; Zhang QL; Jiao B; Chen XJ; Chen R; Gong W; Yao SJ; Lin DQ
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2021 Sep; 118(9):3313-3322. PubMed ID: 33480439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization study on periodic counter-current chromatography integrated in a monoclonal antibody downstream process.
Gomis-Fons J; Andersson N; Nilsson B
J Chromatogr A; 2020 Jun; 1621():461055. PubMed ID: 32276855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of dynamic control of continuous capture with periodic counter-current chromatography under feedstock variations.
Fan Y; Sun YN; Qiao LZ; Mao RQ; Tang SY; Shi C; Yao SJ; Lin DQ
J Chromatogr A; 2024 Jan; 1713():464528. PubMed ID: 38029658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Model assisted comparison of Protein A resins and multi-column chromatography for capture processes.
Baur D; Angelo JM; Chollangi S; Xu X; Müller-Späth T; Zhang N; Ghose S; Li ZJ; Morbidelli M
J Biotechnol; 2018 Nov; 285():64-73. PubMed ID: 30165118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of feed quality due to clarification strategy on the design and performance of protein A periodic counter-current chromatography.
El-Sabbahy H; Ward D; Ogonah O; Deakin L; Jellum GM; Bracewell DG
Biotechnol Prog; 2018 Nov; 34(6):1380-1392. PubMed ID: 30281957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of multi-column chromatography configurations through model-based optimization.
Pareek A; Buddhiraju VS; Masampally VS; Premraj K; Runkana V
Biotechnol Prog; 2023; 39(6):e3376. PubMed ID: 37454372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An NIR-based PAT approach for real-time control of loading in Protein A chromatography in continuous manufacturing of monoclonal antibodies.
Thakur G; Hebbi V; Rathore AS
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2020 Mar; 117(3):673-686. PubMed ID: 31788777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Model-based process development and evaluation of twin-column continuous capture processes with Protein A affinity resin.
Sun YN; Shi C; Zhang QL; Yao SJ; Slater NKH; Lin DQ
J Chromatogr A; 2020 Aug; 1625():461300. PubMed ID: 32709343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of batch and continuous multi-column protein A capture processes by optimal design.
Baur D; Angarita M; Müller-Späth T; Steinebach F; Morbidelli M
Biotechnol J; 2016 Jul; 11(7):920-31. PubMed ID: 26992151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal model-based design of the twin-column CaptureSMB process improves capacity utilization and productivity in protein A affinity capture.
Baur D; Angarita M; Müller-Späth T; Morbidelli M
Biotechnol J; 2016 Jan; 11(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 26308369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Twin-column CaptureSMB: a novel cyclic process for protein A affinity chromatography.
Angarita M; Müller-Späth T; Baur D; Lievrouw R; Lissens G; Morbidelli M
J Chromatogr A; 2015 Apr; 1389():85-95. PubMed ID: 25748537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Model-based process development of continuous chromatography for antibody capture: A case study with twin-column system.
Shi C; Gao ZY; Zhang QL; Yao SJ; Slater NKH; Lin DQ
J Chromatogr A; 2020 May; 1619():460936. PubMed ID: 32037074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Protein A affinity resins for twin-column continuous capture processes: Process performance and resin characteristics.
Sun YN; Shi C; Zhang QL; Slater NKH; Jungbauer A; Yao SJ; Lin DQ
J Chromatogr A; 2021 Sep; 1654():462454. PubMed ID: 34407469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving affinity chromatography resin efficiency using semi-continuous chromatography.
Mahajan E; George A; Wolk B
J Chromatogr A; 2012 Mar; 1227():154-62. PubMed ID: 22265178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Continuous countercurrent tangential chromatography for mixed mode post-capture operations in monoclonal antibody purification.
Dutta AK; Fedorenko D; Tan J; Costanzo JA; Kahn DS; Zydney AL; Shinkazh O
J Chromatogr A; 2017 Aug; 1511():37-44. PubMed ID: 28697935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel framework of surrogate-based feasibility analysis for establishing design space of twin-column continuous chromatography.
Ding C; Ierapetritou M
Int J Pharm; 2021 Nov; 609():121161. PubMed ID: 34624445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A regressive approach to the design of continuous capture process with multi-column chromatography for monoclonal antibodies.
Chen CS; Konoike F; Yoshimoto N; Yamamoto S
J Chromatogr A; 2021 Nov; 1658():462604. PubMed ID: 34695664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Online optimization of dynamic binding capacity and productivity by model predictive control.
Eslami T; Steinberger M; Csizmazia C; Jungbauer A; Lingg N
J Chromatogr A; 2022 Sep; 1680():463420. PubMed ID: 36007474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A straightforward methodology for designing continuous monoclonal antibody capture multi-column chromatography processes.
Gjoka X; Rogler K; Martino RA; Gantier R; Schofield M
J Chromatogr A; 2015 Oct; 1416():38-46. PubMed ID: 26363944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
