These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35843416)

  • 21. Sensory attenuation of self-initiated sounds maps onto habitual associations between motor action and sound.
    Mifsud NG; Whitford TJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Aug; 103():38-43. PubMed ID: 28720523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The modulation of auditory novelty processing by working memory load in school age children and adults: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Ruhnau P; Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 11():126. PubMed ID: 20929535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Action-sound coincidence-related attenuation of auditory ERPs is not modulated by affordance compatibility.
    Horváth J
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Apr; 93(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 23298717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. ERP correlates of processing the auditory consequences of own versus observed actions.
    Ghio M; Scharmach K; Bellebaum C
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jun; 55(6):e13048. PubMed ID: 29266338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Illusion of control affects ERP amplitude reductions for auditory outcomes of self-generated actions.
    Seidel A; Ghio M; Studer B; Bellebaum C
    Psychophysiology; 2021 May; 58(5):e13792. PubMed ID: 33604896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensory suppression and increased neuromodulation during actions disrupt memory encoding of unpredictable self-initiated stimuli.
    Paraskevoudi N; SanMiguel I
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Jan; 60(1):e14156. PubMed ID: 35918912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Role of the supplementary motor area in auditory sensory attenuation.
    Jo HG; Habel U; Schmidt S
    Brain Struct Funct; 2019 Sep; 224(7):2577-2586. PubMed ID: 31312903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Auditory N1 and P2 attenuation in action observation: An event-related potential study considering effects of temporal predictability and individualism.
    Egan S; Ghio M; Bellebaum C
    Biol Psychol; 2023 May; 180():108575. PubMed ID: 37156324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Exploring the internal forward model: action-effect prediction and attention in sensorimotor processing.
    Harrison AW; Hughes G; Rudman G; Christensen BK; Whitford TJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Jul; 33(14):9130-9143. PubMed ID: 37288477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Late ERP correlates of confidence for auditory categorization of complex sounds.
    Zakrzewski AC; Maniscalco B; Wisniewski MG
    Neurosci Lett; 2023 Jun; 808():137294. PubMed ID: 37172774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attenuation of auditory ERPs to action-sound coincidences is not explained by voluntary allocation of attention.
    Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Mar; 50(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 23316925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Processing of self-initiated sound motion in the human brain.
    Altmann CF; Yamasaki D; Song Y; Bucher B
    Brain Res; 2021 Jul; 1762():147433. PubMed ID: 33737062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of presentation rate on auditory processing in Rett syndrome: event-related potential study.
    Kostanian D; Rebreikina A; Voinova V; Sysoeva O
    Mol Autism; 2023 Oct; 14(1):40. PubMed ID: 37885019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sensitivity to syllable stress regularities in externally but not self-triggered speech in Dutch.
    Emmendorfer AK; Bonte M; Jansma BM; Kotz SA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Jul; 58(1):2297-2314. PubMed ID: 37122233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Similar sound intensity dependence of the N1 and P2 components of the auditory ERP: Averaged and single trial evidence.
    Paiva TO; Almeida PR; Ferreira-Santos F; Vieira JB; Silveira C; Chaves PL; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):499-508. PubMed ID: 26154993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The nature of selective attention effects on auditory event-related potentials.
    Michie PT; Bearpark HM; Crawford JM; Glue LC
    Biol Psychol; 1990 Jun; 30(3):219-50. PubMed ID: 2282370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory ERPs to non-target stimuli in schizophrenia: relationship to probability, task-demands, and target ERPs.
    O'Donnell BF; Hokama H; McCarley RW; Smith RS; Salisbury DF; Mondrow E; Nestor PG; Shenton ME
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 Aug; 17(3):219-31. PubMed ID: 7806466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Suppression of the N1 auditory evoked potential for sounds generated by the upper and lower limbs.
    van Elk M; Salomon R; Kannape O; Blanke O
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Oct; 102():108-17. PubMed ID: 25019590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.