BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35843537)

  • 1. Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.
    Shahi P; Vaishnav AS; Mai E; Kim JH; Dalal S; Song J; Shinn DJ; Melissaridou D; Araghi K; Urakawa H; Sivaganesan A; Lafage V; Qureshi SA; Iyer S
    Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 35843537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improvement in predominant back pain following minimally invasive decompression for spinal stenosis.
    Korsun MK; Shahi P; Shinn DJ; Pajak A; Araghi K; Maayan O; Singh N; Tuma O; Asada T; Singh S; Kim AYE; Mai E; Lu AZ; Sheha E; Dowdell J; Qureshi S; Iyer S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Oct; 39(4):576-582. PubMed ID: 37486867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Leg Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement, and Patient Satisfaction After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Parsons AW; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e1196-e1207. PubMed ID: 36075356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of Preoperative 12-Item Short Form Mental Composite Score on Clinical Outcomes in an Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Population Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Patel MR; Jacob KC; Patel SD; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Feb; 158():e1022-e1030. PubMed ID: 34906755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Ribot MA; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():e334-e346. PubMed ID: 34942388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.
    Kang MS; You KH; Choi JY; Heo DH; Chung HJ; Park HJ
    Spine J; 2021 Dec; 21(12):2066-2077. PubMed ID: 34171465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of Ambulatory Setting for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing One-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Review of the Literature.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Oyetayo OO; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e251-e267. PubMed ID: 35948231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients aged 70 years or older compared with younger age groups.
    Shahi P; Dalal S; Shinn D; Song J; Araghi K; Melissaridou D; Sheha E; Dowdell J; Iyer S; Qureshi SA
    Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E4. PubMed ID: 36587410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association between muscle health and patient-reported outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy: early results.
    Song J; Araghi K; Dupont MM; Shahi P; Bovonratwet P; Shinn D; Dalal SS; Melissaridou D; Virk SS; Iyer S; Dowdell JE; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1677-1686. PubMed ID: 35671940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Postoperative Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Yoo JS; Patel DS; Hrynewycz NM; Brundage TS; Mogilevsky FA; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2020 Jul; 33(6):E263-E268. PubMed ID: 31503049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms?
    Morse KW; Alluri RK; Vaishnav AS; Urakawa H; Mok JK; Virk SS; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Apr; 22(4):570-577. PubMed ID: 34699995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of PROMIS in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary evaluation.
    Haws BE; Khechen B; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Bohl DD; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jul; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 29652236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does loss of spondylolisthesis reduction impact clinical and radiographic outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Steinhaus ME; Vaishnav AS; Shah SP; Clark NJ; Chaudhary CB; Othman YA; Urakawa H; Samuel AM; Lovecchio FC; Sheha ED; McAnany SJ; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 34118417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recovery ratios and minimum clinically important difference for clinical outcomes in workers' compensation recipients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus ALIF.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Zheng E; Massel DH; Singh K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Feb; 165(2):315-323. PubMed ID: 36637505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; MacGregor KR; Oyetayo OO; Zheng E; Singh K
    Neurosurgery; 2023 Jun; 92(6):1199-1207. PubMed ID: 36625578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of Obesity Severity on Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Mohan S; Geoghegan CE; Jadczak CN; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2022 Feb; 35(1):E267-E273. PubMed ID: 34050042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.