These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35843723)

  • 21. Conditional Independence Test of Failure and Truncation Times: Essential Tool for Method Selection.
    Ning J; Pak D; Zhu H; Qin J
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2022 Apr; 168():. PubMed ID: 34898770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bias due to left truncation and left censoring in longitudinal studies of developmental and disease processes.
    Cain KC; Harlow SD; Little RJ; Nan B; Yosef M; Taffe JR; Elliott MR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 May; 173(9):1078-84. PubMed ID: 21422059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of statistical methods to predict the residual lifetime risk.
    Conner SC; Beiser A; Benjamin EJ; LaValley MP; Larson MG; Trinquart L
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2022 Feb; 37(2):173-194. PubMed ID: 34978669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Conditional maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric transformation model with LTRC data.
    Chen CM; Shen PS
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2018 Apr; 24(2):250-272. PubMed ID: 28168333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Selection bias introduced by informative censoring in studies examining effects of vaccination in infancy.
    López-López JA; Sterne JAC; Higgins JPT
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Dec; 48(6):2001-2009. PubMed ID: 31071211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Left truncation results in substantial bias of the relation between time-dependent exposures and adverse events.
    Hazelbag CM; Klungel OH; van Staa TP; de Boer A; Groenwold RH
    Ann Epidemiol; 2015 Aug; 25(8):590-6. PubMed ID: 25935711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A semiparametric mixture cure survival model for left-truncated and right-censored data.
    Chen CM; Shen PS; Wei JC; Lin L
    Biom J; 2017 Mar; 59(2):270-290. PubMed ID: 27878856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Living With Survival Analysis in Orthopedics.
    Crowson CS; Larson DR; Devick KL; Atkinson EJ; Lundgreen CS; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Maradit Kremers H
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Oct; 36(10):3358-3361. PubMed ID: 33934952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Missing Information Principle: A Unified Approach for General Truncated and Censored Survival Data Problems.
    Sun Y; Qin J; Huang CY
    Stat Sci; 2018 May; 33(2):261-276. PubMed ID: 31327890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating cumulative incidence functions in competing risks data with dependent left-truncation.
    Stegherr R; Allignol A; Meister R; Schaefer C; Beyersmann J
    Stat Med; 2020 Feb; 39(4):481-493. PubMed ID: 31788835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating a time-to-event distribution from right-truncated data in an epidemic: A review of methods.
    Seaman SR; Presanis A; Jackson C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Sep; 31(9):1641-1655. PubMed ID: 34931911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A joint frailty-copula model between tumour progression and death for meta-analysis.
    Emura T; Nakatochi M; Murotani K; Rondeau V
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2649-2666. PubMed ID: 26384516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A pairwise pseudo-likelihood approach for left-truncated and interval-censored data under the Cox model.
    Wang P; Li D; Sun J
    Biometrics; 2021 Dec; 77(4):1303-1314. PubMed ID: 33058180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimation of reinforced urn processes under left-truncation and right-censoring.
    Souto Arias LA; Cirillo P; Oosterlee CW
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Mar; 10(3):221223. PubMed ID: 36908984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cox proportional hazards models with left truncation and time-varying coefficient: Application of age at event as outcome in cohort studies.
    Kim M; Paik MC; Jang J; Cheung YK; Willey J; Elkind MSV; Sacco RL
    Biom J; 2017 May; 59(3):405-419. PubMed ID: 28160312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conditions for bias from differential left truncation.
    Howards PP; Hertz-Picciotto I; Poole C
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 165(4):444-52. PubMed ID: 17150983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. General regression model for the subdistribution of a competing risk under left-truncation and right-censoring.
    Bellach A; Kosorok MR; Gilbert PB; Fine JP
    Biometrika; 2020 Dec; 107(4):949-964. PubMed ID: 33462536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Look left, look right: censoring in clinical research.
    Groenwold RHH; Dekkers OM
    Eur J Endocrinol; 2023 Nov; 189(5):E1-E3. PubMed ID: 37956460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Approximating the baseline hazard function by taylor series for interval-censored time-to-event data.
    Chen DG; Yu L; Peace KE; Lio YL; Wang Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):695-708. PubMed ID: 23611204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Regression with a right-censored predictor using inverse probability weighting methods.
    Matsouaka RA; Atem FD
    Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(27):4001-4015. PubMed ID: 32779274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.