141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35843789)
1. Clinical significance of postoperative skeletal relapse in the treatment of mandibular prognathism: Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Chen CM; Hsu HJ; Hsu KJ; Tseng YC
J Formos Med Assoc; 2022 Dec; 121(12):2593-2600. PubMed ID: 35843789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial.
Li DTS; Wang R; Wong NSM; Leung YY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 34627665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors related to skeletal relapse in the two-jaw surgery treatment of mandibular prognathism.
Chen KJ; Chen YC; Cheng JH; Chen CM; Tseng YC
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 119(2):113-117. PubMed ID: 29196228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Results in Good Long-Term Mandibular Stability in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Anterior Open Bite.
Choi SH; Cha JY; Park HS; Hwang CJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):804-10. PubMed ID: 26518527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies for mandibular setback: a longitudinal study.
Kung AYH; Leung YY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):152-159. PubMed ID: 28966068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment.
Choi SH; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Jung YS; Lee KJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 74(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 26259691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between the change of gonial region and skeletal relapse after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lee KT; Lai SS; Wu JH; Lee HE; Chen CM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):818-21. PubMed ID: 21558938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Changes of Cheek Line (Lateral) and Face Line (Frontal) after Correction of Mandibular Prognathism.
Tseng YC; Cheng JH; Chen MY; Chen KJ; Chen CM
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():4926528. PubMed ID: 29992146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the amount of mandibular setback during bimaxillary surgery correlate with the degree of surgical relapse?
Takahara N; Kimura A; Tomomatsu N; Nakakuki K; Yoda T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 May; 129(5):447-452. PubMed ID: 32102761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies.
Chen CM; Tseng YC; Ko EC; Chen MY; Chen KJ; Cheng JH
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1375085. PubMed ID: 30662900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skeletal and dental stability after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: a long-term follow-up.
Schilbred Eriksen E; Wisth PJ; Løes S; Moen K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 27545999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and factors related to skeletal relapse.
Chen CM; Lai SS; Wang CH; Wu JH; Lee KT; Lee HE
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 20871995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment.
Han JJ; Yang HJ; Lee SJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 24411469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Skeletal and dental variables related to the stability of orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion with a surgery-first approach.
Ko EW; Lin SC; Chen YR; Huang CS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):e215-23. PubMed ID: 23455415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postoperative stability for surgery-first approach using intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: 12 month follow-up.
Kim JY; Jung HD; Kim SY; Park HS; Jung YS
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 52(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 24746355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Major factors contributing to anterior and posterior relapse after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Choi SH; Kang DY; Cha JY; Jung YS; Yu HS; Park HS; Hwang CJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 44(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 26897301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between Frontal Gap and Postoperative Stability in the Treatment of Mandibular Prognathism.
Tseng YC; Hsu KJ; Chen KK; Wu JH; Chen CM
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7046361. PubMed ID: 27774457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Are Hyoid Bone and Tongue the Risk Factors Contributing to Postoperative Relapse for Mandibular Prognathism?
Tseng YC; Lai S; Lee HE; Chen KK; Chen CM
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():5284248. PubMed ID: 27042664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
