These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35844085)

  • 1. Bayesian unanchored additive models for component network meta-analysis.
    Wigle A; Béliveau A
    Stat Med; 2022 Sep; 41(22):4444-4466. PubMed ID: 35844085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model selection for component network meta-analysis in connected and disconnected networks: a simulation study.
    Petropoulou M; Rücker G; Weibel S; Kranke P; Schwarzer G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jun; 23(1):140. PubMed ID: 37316775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian models for aggregate and individual patient data component network meta-analysis.
    Efthimiou O; Seo M; Karyotaki E; Cuijpers P; Furukawa TA; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Mavridis D
    Stat Med; 2022 Jun; 41(14):2586-2601. PubMed ID: 35261053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Network meta-analysis of multicomponent interventions.
    Rücker G; Petropoulou M; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2020 May; 62(3):808-821. PubMed ID: 31021449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Component network meta-analysis compared to a matching method in a disconnected network: A case study.
    Rücker G; Schmitz S; Schwarzer G
    Biom J; 2021 Feb; 63(2):447-461. PubMed ID: 32596834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Data visualisation approaches for component network meta-analysis: visualising the data structure.
    Freeman SC; Saeedi E; Ordóñez-Mena JM; Nevill CR; Hartmann-Boyce J; Caldwell DM; Welton NJ; Cooper NJ; Sutton AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Sep; 23(1):208. PubMed ID: 37715126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random-effects network meta-analysis of binary data.
    Seide SE; Jensen K; Kieser M
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):363-378. PubMed ID: 31955519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Degree irregularity and rank probability bias in network meta-analysis.
    Davies AL; Galla T
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 May; 12(3):316-332. PubMed ID: 32935913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theory and practice of Bayesian and frequentist frameworks for network meta-analysis.
    Sadeghirad B; Foroutan F; Zoratti MJ; Busse JW; Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt G; Thabane L
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Jun; 28(3):204-209. PubMed ID: 35760451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Participants' outcomes gone missing within a network of interventions: Bayesian modeling strategies.
    Spineli LM; Kalyvas C; Pateras K
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(20):3861-3879. PubMed ID: 31134664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian meta-analysis using SAS PROC BGLIMM.
    Rott KW; Lin L; Hodges JS; Siegel L; Shi A; Chen Y; Chu H
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):692-700. PubMed ID: 34245227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hypothesis testing in Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    Uhlmann L; Jensen K; Kieser M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):128. PubMed ID: 30419827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative review of network meta-analysis models in longitudinal randomized controlled trial.
    Tallarita M; De Iorio M; Baio G
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(16):3053-3072. PubMed ID: 31050822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to read and interpret the results of a Bayesian network meta-analysis: a short tutorial.
    Hu D; O'Connor AM; Winder CB; Sargeant JM; Wang C
    Anim Health Res Rev; 2019 Dec; 20(2):106-115. PubMed ID: 32081116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive P-score for treatment ranking in Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    Rosenberger KJ; Duan R; Chen Y; Lin L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):213. PubMed ID: 34657593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis and Indirect Comparisons: on Methods, Paradigms, and Biologic Treatments for Psoriasis.
    Puig L
    Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed); 2021 Mar; 112(3):203-215. PubMed ID: 33053367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Graphical evaluation of evidence structure within a component network meta-analysis.
    Li H; Shih MC; Tu YK
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Jul; 14(4):596-607. PubMed ID: 36695091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Component network meta-analysis identifies the most effective components of psychological preparation for adults undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.
    Freeman SC; Scott NW; Powell R; Johnston M; Sutton AJ; Cooper NJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 98():105-116. PubMed ID: 29476923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Critical quality evaluation of network meta-analyses in dental care.
    Lee DW; Shin IS
    J Dent; 2018 Aug; 75():7-11. PubMed ID: 29879456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.