These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35844145)

  • 21. Constructing gene networks using variational Bayesian variable selection.
    Tienda-Luna IM; Yin Y; Huang Y; Padillo DP; Perez MC; Wang Y
    Artif Life; 2008; 14(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 18171131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Variational Bayes Genomic-Enabled Prediction Model with Genotype × Environment Interaction.
    Montesinos-López OA; Montesinos-López A; Crossa J; Montesinos-López JC; Luna-Vázquez FJ; Salinas-Ruiz J; Herrera-Morales JR; Buenrostro-Mariscal R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jun; 7(6):1833-1853. PubMed ID: 28391241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bayesian Genome-wide TWAS Method to Leverage both cis- and trans-eQTL Information through Summary Statistics.
    Luningham JM; Chen J; Tang S; De Jager PL; Bennett DA; Buchman AS; Yang J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Oct; 107(4):714-726. PubMed ID: 32961112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bayesian meta-analysis models for cross cancer genomic investigation of pleiotropic effects using group structure.
    Baghfalaki T; Sugier PE; Truong T; Pettitt AN; Mengersen K; Liquet B
    Stat Med; 2021 Mar; 40(6):1498-1518. PubMed ID: 33368447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bayesian network-driven clustering analysis with feature selection for high-dimensional multi-modal molecular data.
    Zhao Y; Chang C; Hannum M; Lee J; Shen R
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):5146. PubMed ID: 33664338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Introduction to Bayesian variable selection methods in high-dimensional omics data analysis].
    Dong XQ; Xu SH; Tao R; Wang T
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 May; 38(5):679-683. PubMed ID: 28651411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bayesian model averaging of naive Bayes for clustering.
    Santafé G; Lozano JA; Larrañaga P
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2006 Oct; 36(5):1149-61. PubMed ID: 17036820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accurate ranking of differentially expressed genes by a distribution-free shrinkage approach.
    Opgen-Rhein R; Strimmer K
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2007; 6():Article9. PubMed ID: 17402924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. GWASinlps: non-local prior based iterative SNP selection tool for genome-wide association studies.
    Sanyal N; Lo MT; Kauppi K; Djurovic S; Andreassen OA; Johnson VE; Chen CH
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 29931045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A regularized functional regression model enabling transcriptome-wide dosage-dependent association study of cancer drug response.
    Koukouli E; Wang D; Dondelinger F; Park J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jan; 17(1):e1008066. PubMed ID: 33493149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Identification of the minimum effective dose for normally distributed data using a Bayesian variable selection approach.
    Otava M; Shkedy Z; Hothorn LA; Talloen W; Gerhard D; Kasim A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(6):1073-1088. PubMed ID: 28328286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bayesian variable selection for high dimensional predictors and self-reported outcomes.
    Gu X; Tadesse MG; Foulkes AS; Ma Y; Balasubramanian R
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Sep; 20(1):212. PubMed ID: 32894123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bayesian Variable Selection Methods for Matched Case-Control Studies.
    Asafu-Adjei J; Mahlet GT; Coull B; Balasubramanian R; Lev M; Schwamm L; Betensky R
    Int J Biostat; 2017 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 28157692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prior robust empirical Bayes inference for large-scale data by conditioning on rank with application to microarray data.
    Liao JG; McMurry T; Berg A
    Biostatistics; 2014 Jan; 15(1):60-73. PubMed ID: 23934072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bayesian predictive modeling for genomic based personalized treatment selection.
    Ma J; Stingo FC; Hobbs BP
    Biometrics; 2016 Jun; 72(2):575-83. PubMed ID: 26575856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Model selection in medical research: a simulation study comparing Bayesian model averaging and stepwise regression.
    Genell A; Nemes S; Steineck G; Dickman PW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Dec; 10():108. PubMed ID: 21134252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bayesian inference of negative and positive selection in human cancers.
    Weghorn D; Sunyaev S
    Nat Genet; 2017 Dec; 49(12):1785-1788. PubMed ID: 29106416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. TIGAR: An Improved Bayesian Tool for Transcriptomic Data Imputation Enhances Gene Mapping of Complex Traits.
    Nagpal S; Meng X; Epstein MP; Tsoi LC; Patrick M; Gibson G; De Jager PL; Bennett DA; Wingo AP; Wingo TS; Yang J
    Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Aug; 105(2):258-266. PubMed ID: 31230719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. BREM-SC: a bayesian random effects mixture model for joint clustering single cell multi-omics data.
    Wang X; Sun Z; Zhang Y; Xu Z; Xin H; Huang H; Duerr RH; Chen K; Ding Y; Chen W
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Jun; 48(11):5814-5824. PubMed ID: 32379315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.