These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3584580)

  • 21. Quantification of skin blood flow at patch test sites.
    Wahlberg JE; Wahlberg EN
    Contact Dermatitis; 1987 Oct; 17(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 2962819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "Reactions" to standard patch test materials.
    Kligman AM; Leyden JJ
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1979; 59(85):101-3. PubMed ID: 294084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The patch test.
    Guin JD
    J Ark Med Soc; 1984 Mar; 80(10):444-6. PubMed ID: 6232255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of three different techniques for application of water solutions to Finn Chambers®.
    Frick-Engfeldt M; Gruvberger B; Isaksson M; Hauksson I; Pontén A; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):284-8. PubMed ID: 20946457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contradictory results following patch testing with Finn Chambers.
    Hammershøy O
    Contact Dermatitis; 1980 Apr; 6(3):216-8. PubMed ID: 7389334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Reproducibility of epicutaneous test results].
    Szliska C; Rakoski J
    Z Hautkr; 1988; 63 Suppl 4():67-9. PubMed ID: 2978100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Patch tests: methodological problems (author's transl)].
    Spallanzani P; Sertoli A; Morini R; Fabbri P
    Med Lav; 1980; 71(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 7453639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Patch tests: evaluation by instrumental methods.
    De Boer EM; Bruynzeel DP
    Clin Dermatol; 1996; 14(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 8901398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative multicenter studies with TRUE Test and Finn Chambers in eight Swedish hospitals. TRUE Test Study Group.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):846-9. PubMed ID: 2689478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Standardizing the Delivery of 20 μL of Hapten During Patch Testing.
    Selvick A; Stauss K; Strobush K; Taylor L; Picard A; Doll A; Reeder M
    Dermatitis; 2016; 27(5):272-5. PubMed ID: 27649349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative study of IQ-ultra and Finn Chambers test methodologies in detecting 10 common standard allergens that cause allergic contact dermatitis.
    Doumit J; Pratt M
    J Cutan Med Surg; 2012; 16(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 22417991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Should metal alloy discs be used for patch testing in suspected metal implant intolerance reaction?].
    Thomas P; Geier J; Dickel H; Diepgen T; Hillen U; Kreft B; Schnuch A; Szliska C; Mahler V
    Orthopade; 2015 Nov; 44(11):905-8. PubMed ID: 26438196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validation of a novel epicutaneous delivery system for patch testing of house dust mite-hypersensitive dogs.
    Olivry T; Linder KE; Paps JS; Bizikova P; Dunston S; Donne N; Mondoulet L
    Vet Dermatol; 2012 Dec; 23(6):525-e106. PubMed ID: 23050930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Allergic contact dermatitis secondary to the use of aluminium Finn Chambers®.
    King N; Moffitt D
    Contact Dermatitis; 2018 May; 78(5):365-366. PubMed ID: 29611265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Which test chambers should be used for acetone, ethanol, and water solutions when patch testing?
    Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):134-6. PubMed ID: 17627666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does patch testing with ammoniated mercury in a Finn Chamber give a false positive reaction?
    Kubo Y; Anan S; Nonaka S; Yoshida H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Aug; 27(2):118-9. PubMed ID: 1395618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Optimal patch application time in the evaluation of skin irritation.
    Kanto H; Washizaki K; Ito M; Matsunaga K; Akamatsu H; Kawai K; Katoh N; Natsuaki M; Yoshimura I; Kojima H; Okamoto Y; Okuda M; Kuwahara H; Sugiyama M; Kinoshita S; Mori F
    J Dermatol; 2013 May; 40(5):363-9. PubMed ID: 23414058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Practical aspects of patch testing (allergic reaction, irritable reaction, open test, closed patch test)].
    Nishioka K
    Arerugi; 2008 Dec; 57(12):1260-4. PubMed ID: 19169079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recommendation of appropriate amounts of petrolatum preparation to be applied at patch testing.
    Bruze M; Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 May; 56(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 17441852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Finn chamber methylene blue ring.
    Fischer T; Maibach H
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Jan; 12(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3979040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.