164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35846405)
1. Can surgeons optimize range of motion and reduce scapulohumeral impingements in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A computational study.
Gauci MO; Chaoui J; Berhouet J; Jacquot A; Walch G; Boileau P
Shoulder Elbow; 2022 Aug; 14(4):385-394. PubMed ID: 35846405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is preoperative 3D planning reliable for predicting postoperative clinical differences in range of motion between two stem designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Gauci MO; Glevarec L; Bronsard N; Cointat C; Pelletier Y; Boileau P; Gonzalez JF
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38281677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of humeral and glenoid component variations on range of motion in reverse geometry total shoulder arthroplasty: a standardized computer model study.
Arenas-Miquelez A; Murphy RJ; Rosa A; Caironi D; Zumstein MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):763-771. PubMed ID: 32763384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Chaoui J; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Oct; 26(10):1726-1731. PubMed ID: 28528016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lateralized glenosphere reverse shoulder arthroplasty: inlay and onlay designs have similar clinical outcomes in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
Meshram P; Joseph J; Zhou Y; Srikumaran U; McFarland EG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Apr; 31(4):747-754. PubMed ID: 34543744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study.
Beltrame A; Di Benedetto P; Cicuto C; Cainero V; Chisoni R; Causero A
Acta Biomed; 2019 Dec; 90(12-S):54-63. PubMed ID: 31821285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical results of bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an onlay 145° curved stem in patients with cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study.
Franceschetti E; Ranieri R; Giovanetti de Sanctis E; Palumbo A; Franceschi F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jan; 29(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 31401130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty component position in the setting of advanced arthritis with posterior glenoid erosion: a computer-enhanced range of motion analysis.
Keener JD; Patterson BM; Orvets N; Aleem AW; Chamberlain AM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Feb; 27(2):339-349. PubMed ID: 29332666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of humeral stem and glenosphere designs on range of motion and muscle length in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Collin P; Zbinden O; Chiu JC; Boileau P; Olivier F; Walch G
Int Orthop; 2020 Mar; 44(3):519-530. PubMed ID: 31900574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of 145° onlay curved stem versus 155° inlay straight stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic results with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Giordano MC; Corona K; Morris BJ; Mocini F; Saturnino L; Cerciello S
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2089-2095. PubMed ID: 35430369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What is the best glenoid configuration in onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Boileau P; Farron A; Deransart P; Walch G
Int Orthop; 2018 Jun; 42(6):1339-1346. PubMed ID: 29492611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rates of subacromial notching are low following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component and a lateralized glenoid.
Pak T; Menendez ME; Gobezie R; Sears BW; Lederman E; ; Werner BC; Denard PJ
JSES Int; 2024 May; 8(3):522-527. PubMed ID: 38707585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scapular Notching on Kinematic Simulated Range of Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Not the Result of Impingement in Adduction.
Lädermann A; Gueorguiev B; Charbonnier C; Stimec BV; Fasel JHD; Zderic I; Hagen J; Walch G
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Sep; 94(38):e1615. PubMed ID: 26402829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Boileau P; Farron A; Deransart P; Terrier A; Ston J; Walch G
Int Orthop; 2015 Nov; 39(11):2205-13. PubMed ID: 26381907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of constrained humeral liner on impingement-free range of motion and impingement type in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a computer simulation.
Nakazawa K; Manaka T; Minoda Y; Hirakawa Y; Ito Y; Iio R; Nakamura H
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jan; 33(1):181-191. PubMed ID: 37598837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inlay versus onlay humeral design for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Larose G; Fisher ND; Gambhir N; Alben MG; Zuckerman JD; Virk MS; Kwon YW
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Nov; 31(11):2410-2420. PubMed ID: 35671928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical consequences of glenoid and humeral lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Liu B; Kim YK; Nakla A; Chung MS; Kwak D; McGarry MH; Lee TQ; Oh JH
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Aug; 32(8):1662-1672. PubMed ID: 37044302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Onlay versus inlay humeral components in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jackson GR; Meade J; Young BL; Trofa DP; Schiffern SC; Hamid N; Saltzman BM
Shoulder Elbow; 2023 Feb; 15(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 36895614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mid-term comparative study between the glenoid and humerus lateralization designs for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: which lateralization design is better?
Lee HH; Park SE; Ji JH; Jun HS
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Apr; 24(1):290. PubMed ID: 37059977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bony increased-offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 5 to 10 years' follow-up.
Boileau P; Morin-Salvo N; Bessière C; Chelli M; Gauci MO; Lemmex DB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2111-2122. PubMed ID: 32505414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
