These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35846986)

  • 21. China's multi-sector-shared CCUS networks in a carbon-neutral vision.
    Tang H; Chen W; Zhang S; Zhang Q
    iScience; 2023 Apr; 26(4):106347. PubMed ID: 36994081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Economic leverage affords post-combustion capture of 43% of carbon emissions: Supersonic separators for methanol hydrate inhibitor recovery from raw natural gas and CO
    Teixeira AM; Arinelli LO; de Medeiros JL; Araújo OQF
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Apr; 236():534-550. PubMed ID: 30771673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Deployment models for commercialized carbon capture and storage.
    Esposito RA; Monroe LS; Friedman JS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 20722437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of potential, cost, and environmental benefits of CCS-EWR technology for coal-fired power plants in Yellow River Basin of China.
    Xu M; Zhang X; Shen S; Wei S; Fan JL
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Aug; 292():112717. PubMed ID: 34015611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Emissions and risks associated with oxyfuel combustion: state of the science and critical data gaps.
    Senior CL; Morris W; Lewandowski TA
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Jul; 63(7):832-43. PubMed ID: 23926852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Decarbonizing the Coal-Fired Power Sector in China via Carbon Capture, Geological Utilization, and Storage Technology.
    Wei N; Jiao Z; Ellett K; Ku AY; Liu S; Middleton R; Li X
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Oct; 55(19):13164-13173. PubMed ID: 34549588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. CO
    Derse O
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(6):14353-14364. PubMed ID: 36152094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Outlook of carbon capture technology and challenges.
    Wilberforce T; Baroutaji A; Soudan B; Al-Alami AH; Olabi AG
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 657():56-72. PubMed ID: 30530219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. CO
    Roefs P; Moretti M; Welkenhuysen K; Piessens K; Compernolle T
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Jun; 239():167-177. PubMed ID: 30901695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An interval chance-constrained programming-based optimization model for carbon capture, utilization, and storage system planning.
    Zhai M; Jia H; Yin D
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 772():145560. PubMed ID: 33770860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
    Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nanomaterials and hybrid nanocomposites for CO
    Saleh TA
    RSC Adv; 2022 Aug; 12(37):23869-23888. PubMed ID: 36093256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Post-combustion CO
    Akeeb O; Wang L; Xie W; Davis R; Alkasrawi M; Toan S
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 313():115026. PubMed ID: 35405546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Economics of carbon dioxide capture and utilization-a supply and demand perspective.
    Naims H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Nov; 23(22):22226-22241. PubMed ID: 27189450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Carbonic anhydrase to boost CO
    de Oliveira Maciel A; Christakopoulos P; Rova U; Antonopoulou I
    Chemosphere; 2022 Jul; 299():134419. PubMed ID: 35364080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Industrial carbon dioxide capture and utilization: state of the art and future challenges.
    Gao W; Liang S; Wang R; Jiang Q; Zhang Y; Zheng Q; Xie B; Toe CY; Zhu X; Wang J; Huang L; Gao Y; Wang Z; Jo C; Wang Q; Wang L; Liu Y; Louis B; Scott J; Roger AC; Amal R; He H; Park SE
    Chem Soc Rev; 2020 Dec; 49(23):8584-8686. PubMed ID: 33073812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling of CO
    Cho J; Min B; Jeong MS; Lee YW; Lee KS
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):2082. PubMed ID: 33654158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Life cycle assessment of combustion-based electricity generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage: A review.
    Wang Y; Pan Z; Zhang W; Borhani TN; Li R; Zhang Z
    Environ Res; 2022 May; 207():112219. PubMed ID: 34656638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Techno-Economic Evaluation of Technologies to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions at North American Refineries.
    Motazedi K; Abella JP; Bergerson JA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(3):1918-1928. PubMed ID: 28001370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Data on potential of CO
    Wei N; Li X; Jiao Z; Liu S; Dahowski R
    Data Brief; 2019 Apr; 23():103810. PubMed ID: 31372455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.