These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35847769)

  • 1. Morbidity of the Donor Site and Complication Rates of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Abdominal Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Mortada H; AlNojaidi TF; AlRabah R; Almohammadi Y; AlKhashan R; Aljaaly H
    Breast J; 2022; 2022():7857158. PubMed ID: 35847769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Jeong W; Lee S; Kim J
    Breast; 2018 Apr; 38():45-51. PubMed ID: 29227815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction using Abdominally Based Flaps: Analysis of 3,310 Cases.
    Kwok AC; Simpson AM; Ye X; Tatro E; Agarwal JP
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2019 Jan; 35(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 30085346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lee KT; Mun GH
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominally Based Flaps: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database.
    Holoyda KA; Simpson AM; Ye X; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2019 Oct; 35(8):594-601. PubMed ID: 31075801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.
    Bennett KG; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Oct; 153(10):901-908. PubMed ID: 29926077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.
    Erdmann-Sager J; Wilkins EG; Pusic AL; Qi J; Hamill JB; Kim HM; Guldbrandsen GE; Chun YS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 29019862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Chevray PM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
    Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Outcomes following Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using the DIEP and Pedicled TRAM Flaps: A 12-Year Clinical Retrospective Study and Literature Review.
    Knox ADC; Ho AL; Leung L; Tashakkor AY; Lennox PA; Van Laeken N; Macadam SA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Jul; 138(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26267400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing the donor-site morbidity using DIEP, SIEA or MS-TRAM flaps for breast reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis.
    Egeberg A; Rasmussen MK; Sørensen JA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1474-80. PubMed ID: 22841854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Versus Free Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap: Complications and Resource Utilization.
    Zoghbi Y; Gerth DJ; Tashiro J; Golpanian S; Thaller SR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2017 May; 78(5):516-520. PubMed ID: 28052051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Free Versus Pedicled TRAM Flaps: Cost Utilization and Complications.
    Golpanian S; Gerth DJ; Tashiro J; Thaller SR
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Dec; 40(6):869-876. PubMed ID: 27743083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of donor-site morbidity of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.
    Wu LC; Bajaj A; Chang DW; Chevray PM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Sep; 122(3):702-709. PubMed ID: 18766032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cost-effectiveness analysis of DIEP vs free MS-TRAM flap for microsurgical breast reconstruction.
    Tan MG; Isaranuwatchai W; DeLyzer T; Butler K; Hofer SOP; O'Neill AC; Zhong T
    J Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 119(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 30562406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of morbidity, functional outcome, and satisfaction following bilateral TRAM versus bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
    Chun YS; Sinha I; Turko A; Yueh JH; Lipsitz S; Pribaz JJ; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Oct; 126(4):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 20555301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgically Treated Hernia following Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Prevalence, Outcomes, and Expenditures.
    Shubinets V; Fox JP; Sarik JR; Kovach SJ; Fischer JP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):749-757. PubMed ID: 26910655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
    Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.
    Macadam SA; Zhong T; Weichman K; Papsdorf M; Lennox PA; Hazen A; Matros E; Disa J; Mehrara B; Pusic AL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):758-771. PubMed ID: 26910656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative computed tomography angiogram to predict patients with favorable anatomy for superficial inferior epigastric artery flap breast reconstruction.
    Piorkowski JR; DeRosier LC; Nickerson P; Fix RJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2011 May; 66(5):534-6. PubMed ID: 21407054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.