These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35847975)

  • 21. GPCRs from fusarium graminearum detection, modeling and virtual screening - the search for new routes to control head blight disease.
    Bresso E; Togawa R; Hammond-Kosack K; Urban M; Maigret B; Martins NF
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 18):463. PubMed ID: 28105916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cosolvent-Based Molecular Dynamics for Ensemble Docking: Practical Method for Generating Druggable Protein Conformations.
    Uehara S; Tanaka S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Apr; 57(4):742-756. PubMed ID: 28388074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Application of Multiscale Simulation Tools on GPCRs. An Example with Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor.
    Erol I; Aksoydan B; Kantarcioglu I; Durdagi S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1824():431-448. PubMed ID: 30039423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
    Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Discovery of GPCR ligands for probing signal transduction pathways.
    Brogi S; Tafi A; Désaubry L; Nebigil CG
    Front Pharmacol; 2014; 5():255. PubMed ID: 25506327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A benchmarking study on virtual ligand screening against homology models of human GPCRs.
    Lim VJY; Du W; Chen YZ; Fan H
    Proteins; 2018 Sep; 86(9):978-989. PubMed ID: 30051928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Flexi-pharma: a molecule-ranking strategy for virtual screening using pharmacophores from ligand-free conformational ensembles.
    Lans I; Palacio-Rodríguez K; Cavasotto CN; Cossio P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1063-1077. PubMed ID: 32656619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accelerating GPCR Drug Discovery With Conformation-Stabilizing VHHs.
    Laeremans T; Sands ZA; Claes P; De Blieck A; De Cesco S; Triest S; Busch A; Felix D; Kumar A; Jaakola VP; Menet C
    Front Mol Biosci; 2022; 9():863099. PubMed ID: 35677880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computational methods for studying G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).
    Kaczor AA; Rutkowska E; Bartuzi D; Targowska-Duda KM; Matosiuk D; Selent J
    Methods Cell Biol; 2016; 132():359-99. PubMed ID: 26928552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing GPCR homology models constructed from templates of various transmembrane sequence identities: Binding mode prediction and docking enrichment.
    Loo JSE; Emtage AL; Ng KW; Yong ASJ; Doughty SW
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Mar; 80():38-47. PubMed ID: 29306746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sodium or Not Sodium: Should Its Presence Affect the Accuracy of Pose Prediction in Docking GPCR Antagonists?
    Bassani D; Pavan M; Sturlese M; Moro S
    Pharmaceuticals (Basel); 2022 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 35337144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multi-state modeling of G-protein coupled receptors at experimental accuracy.
    Heo L; Feig M
    Proteins; 2022 Nov; 90(11):1873-1885. PubMed ID: 35510704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. GPCR homology model template selection benchmarking: Global versus local similarity measures.
    Castleman PN; Sears CK; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jan; 86():235-246. PubMed ID: 30390544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Structure-based virtual screening of the nociceptin receptor: hybrid docking and shape-based approaches for improved hit identification.
    Daga PR; Polgar WE; Zaveri NT
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2732-43. PubMed ID: 25148595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Virtual fragment screening on GPCRs: a case study on dopamine D3 and histamine H4 receptors.
    Vass M; Schmidt É; Horti F; Keserű GM
    Eur J Med Chem; 2014 Apr; 77():38-46. PubMed ID: 24607587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identifying multiple active conformations in the G protein-coupled receptor activation landscape using computational methods.
    Dong SS; Goddard WA; Abrol R
    Methods Cell Biol; 2017; 142():173-186. PubMed ID: 28964335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bridging molecular docking to membrane molecular dynamics to investigate GPCR-ligand recognition: the human A₂A adenosine receptor as a key study.
    Sabbadin D; Ciancetta A; Moro S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):169-83. PubMed ID: 24359090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sequential application of ligand and structure based modeling approaches to index chemicals for their hH4R antagonism.
    Pappalardo M; Shachaf N; Basile L; Milardi D; Zeidan M; Raiyn J; Guccione S; Rayan A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109340. PubMed ID: 25330207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Target based virtual screening by docking into automatically generated GPCR models.
    Tautermann CS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 914():255-70. PubMed ID: 22976033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.