These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35848428)

  • 1. 3D margin assessment predicts local tumor progression after ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases.
    Vasiniotis Kamarinos N; Gonen M; Sotirchos V; Kaye E; Petre EN; Solomon SB; Erinjeri JP; Ziv E; Kirov A; Sofocleous CT
    Int J Hyperthermia; 2022; 39(1):880-887. PubMed ID: 35848428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Volumetric 3D assessment of ablation zones after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases to improve prediction of local tumor progression.
    Kaye EA; Cornelis FH; Petre EN; Tyagi N; Shady W; Shi W; Zhang Z; Solomon SB; Sofocleous CT; Durack JC
    Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2698-2705. PubMed ID: 30402706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Volumetric assessment of the periablational safety margin after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases.
    Laimer G; Jaschke N; Schullian P; Putzer D; Eberle G; Solbiati M; Solbiati L; Goldberg SN; Bale R
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6489-6499. PubMed ID: 33447860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT-monitored minimal ablative margin control in single-session microwave ablation of liver tumors: an effective strategy for local tumor control.
    Joo I; Morrow KW; Raman SS; McWilliams JP; Sayre JW; Lu DS
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Sep; 32(9):6327-6335. PubMed ID: 35389047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of Contrast Media During CT-guided Thermal Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastasis for Procedure Planning is Associated with Improved Immediate Outcomes.
    Paolucci I; Lin YM; Jones AK; Brock KK; Odisio BC
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2023 Mar; 46(3):327-336. PubMed ID: 36609863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ablative Margins of Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Deformable CT Image Registration and Autosegmentation.
    Lin YM; Paolucci I; O'Connor CS; Anderson BM; Rigaud B; Fellman BM; Jones KA; Brock KK; Odisio BC
    Radiology; 2023 Apr; 307(2):e221373. PubMed ID: 36719291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimal ablative margin (MAM) assessment with image fusion: an independent predictor for local tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation.
    Laimer G; Schullian P; Jaschke N; Putzer D; Eberle G; Alzaga A; Odisio B; Bale R
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2463-2472. PubMed ID: 32002642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraprocedural Versus Initial Follow-up Minimal Ablative Margin Assessment After Colorectal Liver Metastasis Thermal Ablation: Which One Better Predicts Local Outcomes?
    Lin YM; Paolucci I; Albuquerque Marques Silva J; O'Connor CS; Fellman BM; Jones AK; Kuban JD; Huang SY; Metwalli ZA; Brock KK; Odisio BC
    Invest Radiol; 2024 Apr; 59(4):314-319. PubMed ID: 37812469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ablative safety margin depicted by fusion imaging with post-treatment contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pre-treatment CECT/CEMRI after radiofrequency ablation for liver cancers.
    Bo XW; Xu HX; Guo LH; Sun LP; Li XL; Zhao CK; He YP; Liu BJ; Li DD; Zhang K; Wang D
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 90(1078):20170063. PubMed ID: 28749166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional quantitative margin assessment in patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with percutaneous thermal ablation using semi-automatic rigid MRI/CECT-CECT co-registration.
    Faber RA; Burghout KST; Bijlstra OD; Hendriks P; van Erp GCM; Broersen A; Dijkstra J; Vahrmeijer AL; Burgmans MC; Mieog JSD
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 156():110552. PubMed ID: 36228455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative margin assessment of radiofrequency ablation of a solitary colorectal hepatic metastasis using MIRADA RTx on CT scans: a feasibility study.
    Sibinga Mulder BG; Hendriks P; Baetens TR; van Erkel AR; van Rijswijk CSP; van der Meer RW; van de Velde CJH; Vahrmeijer AL; Mieog JSD; Burgmans MC
    BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Aug; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 31429708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-Dimensional Margin as a Predictor of Local Tumor Progression after Microwave Ablation: Intraprocedural versus 4-8-Week Postablation Assessment.
    Zirakchian Zadeh M; Sotirchos VS; Kirov A; Lafontaine D; Gönen M; Yeh R; Kunin H; Petre EN; Kitsel Y; Elsayed M; Solomon SB; Erinjeri JP; Schwartz LH; Sofocleous CT
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2024 Apr; 35(4):523-532.e1. PubMed ID: 38215818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Percutaneous Microwave versus Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Ablation with Clear Margins (A0) Provides the Best Local Tumor Control.
    Shady W; Petre EN; Do KG; Gonen M; Yarmohammadi H; Brown KT; Kemeny NE; D'Angelica M; Kingham PT; Solomon SB; Sofocleous CT
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):268-275.e1. PubMed ID: 29203394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Biopsy of the Ablation Zone and Margins Can Be Used to Predict Oncologic Outcome.
    Sotirchos VS; Petrovic LM; Gönen M; Klimstra DS; Do RK; Petre EN; Garcia AR; Barlas A; Erinjeri JP; Brown KT; Covey AM; Alago W; Brody LA; DeMatteo RP; Kemeny NE; Solomon SB; Manova-Todorova KO; Sofocleous CT
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):949-59. PubMed ID: 27010254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel use of biomechanical model-based deformable image registration (DIR) for assessing colorectal liver metastases ablation outcomes.
    Anderson BM; Lin YM; Lin EY; Cazoulat G; Gupta S; Kyle Jones A; Odisio BC; Brock KK
    Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):6226-6236. PubMed ID: 34342018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local tumor progression after radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases: evaluation of ablative margin and three-dimensional volumetric analysis.
    Frich L; Hagen G; Brabrand K; Edwin B; Mathisen O; Aaløkken TM; Gladhaug IP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Sep; 18(9):1134-40. PubMed ID: 17804776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (> 2 and < 5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion.
    Kim YS; Lee WJ; Rhim H; Lim HK; Choi D; Lee JY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):758-65. PubMed ID: 20729457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the immediate assessment of radiofrequency ablation success in colorectal liver metastases.
    Schraml C; Clasen S; Schwenzer NF; Koenigsrainer I; Herberts T; Claussen CD; Pereira PL
    Abdom Imaging; 2008; 33(6):643-51. PubMed ID: 18175165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraprocedural assessment of ablation margins using computed tomography co-registration in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment with percutaneous ablation: IAMCOMPLETE study.
    Hendriks P; van Dijk KM; Boekestijn B; Broersen A; van Duijn-de Vreugd JJ; Coenraad MJ; Tushuizen ME; van Erkel AR; van der Meer RW; van Rijswijk CS; Dijkstra J; de Geus-Oei LF; Burgmans MC
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2024 Feb; 105(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 37517969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicenter and inter-software evaluation of ablative margins after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases.
    Laimer G; Verdonschot KHM; Kopf L; van der Lei S; Scharll Y; Hannink G; Jenniskens SFM; Meijerink MR; Bale R; Overduin CG
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39093415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.