These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35848541)

  • 1. Experiencing misinformation: The effect of pre-exposure warnings and debunking on psychic beliefs.
    Kuhn G; Ortega J; Simmons K; Thomas C; Mohr C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jun; 76(6):1445-1456. PubMed ID: 35848541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Priming psychic and conjuring abilities of a magic demonstration influences event interpretation and random number generation biases.
    Mohr C; Koutrakis N; Kuhn G
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1542. PubMed ID: 25653626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.
    Giotakos O
    Psychiatriki; 2022 Sep; 33(3):183-186. PubMed ID: 35947862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magic Performances - When Explained in Psychic Terms by University Students.
    Lesaffre L; Kuhn G; Abu-Akel A; Rochat D; Mohr C
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2129. PubMed ID: 30459687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What Debunking of Misinformation Does and Doesn't.
    Jang JW; Lee EJ; Shin SY
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2019 Jun; 22(6):423-427. PubMed ID: 31135182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fake science: The impact of pseudo-psychological demonstrations on people's beliefs in psychological principles.
    Lan Y; Mohr C; Hu X; Kuhn G
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207629. PubMed ID: 30481220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Talking to the Dead in the Classroom: How a Supposedly Psychic Event Impacts Beliefs and Feelings.
    Lesaffre L; Kuhn G; Jopp DS; Mantzouranis G; Diouf CN; Rochat D; Mohr C
    Psychol Rep; 2021 Dec; 124(6):2427-2452. PubMed ID: 33019882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fake news reminders and veracity labels differentially benefit memory and belief accuracy for news headlines.
    Kemp PL; Loaiza VM; Wahlheim CN
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21829. PubMed ID: 36528666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the Identification of Fake News.
    Batailler C; Brannon SM; Teas PE; Gawronski B
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2022 Jan; 17(1):78-98. PubMed ID: 34264150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reminders of Everyday Misinformation Statements Can Enhance Memory for and Beliefs in Corrections of Those Statements in the Short Term.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Peske CD
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1325-1339. PubMed ID: 32976064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The differential effects of a governmental debunking campaign concerning COVID-19 vaccination misinformation.
    Helfers A; Ebersbach M
    J Commun Healthc; 2023 Mar; 16(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 36919806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study.
    Greene CM; Murphy G
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280295. PubMed ID: 36662686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news.
    Martel C; Pennycook G; Rand DG
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Oct; 5(1):47. PubMed ID: 33026546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Challenge of Debunking Health Misinformation in Dynamic Social Media Conversations: Online Randomized Study of Public Masking During COVID-19.
    Mourali M; Drake C
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Mar; 24(3):e34831. PubMed ID: 35156933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nevertheless, partisanship persisted: fake news warnings help briefly, but bias returns with time.
    Grady RH; Ditto PH; Loftus EF
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Jul; 6(1):52. PubMed ID: 34297248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How Can Psychological Science Help Counter the Spread of Fake News?
    van der Linden S; Roozenbeek J; Maertens R; Basol M; Kácha O; Rathje S; Traberg CS
    Span J Psychol; 2021 Apr; 24():e25. PubMed ID: 33840397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What happens after debriefing? The effectiveness and benefits of postexperimental debriefing.
    Greenspan RL; Loftus EF
    Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):696-709. PubMed ID: 34374927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of prebunking and debunking interventions for implied versus explicit misinformation.
    Tay LQ; Hurlstone MJ; Kurz T; Ecker UKH
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Aug; 113(3):591-607. PubMed ID: 34967004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effect of Analytic Cognitive Style on Credulity.
    Ballová Mikušková E; Čavojová V
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():584424. PubMed ID: 33178085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring the effects of misinformation exposure and beliefs on behavioural intentions: a COVID-19 vaccination study.
    de Saint Laurent C; Murphy G; Hegarty K; Greene CM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Oct; 7(1):87. PubMed ID: 36183027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.