These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35848902)

  • 1. Evaluative distractors modulate attentional disengagement: People would rather stay longer on rewards.
    Yan M; Li Q; Long Q; Xu L; Hu N; Chen A
    J Vis; 2022 Jul; 22(8):12. PubMed ID: 35848902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working memory components modulation of attentional disengagement from evaluative distractor.
    Yan M; Tian Y; Hai M; Zhang B; Chen A
    Psych J; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38530871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rewarding outcomes enhance attentional capture and delay attentional disengagement.
    Yan M; Meng Z; Hu N; Chen A
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15868. PubMed ID: 37609441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delayed disengagement of attention from distractors signalling reward.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Theeuwes J; Most SB; Le Pelley ME
    Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104125. PubMed ID: 31751815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli.
    Le Pelley ME; Seabrooke T; Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1628-1642. PubMed ID: 28584955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional capture by Pavlovian reward-signalling distractors in visual search persists when rewards are removed.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Most SB; Theeuwes J; Wiers RW; Le Pelley ME
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226284. PubMed ID: 31830126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pavlovian reward learning underlies value driven attentional capture.
    Bucker B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):415-428. PubMed ID: 27905069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention: Evidence for independent sources of bias.
    Kim H; Anderson BA
    Cognition; 2021 Mar; 208():104554. PubMed ID: 33360961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Winners and losers: Reward and punishment produce biases in temporal selection.
    Le Pelley ME; Watson P; Pearson D; Abeywickrama RS; Most SB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):822-833. PubMed ID: 29985032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monetary and non-monetary rewards reduce attentional capture by emotional distractors.
    Walsh AT; Carmel D; Harper D; Bolitho P; Grimshaw GM
    Cogn Emot; 2021 Feb; 35(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 32762297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Capture or suppression? Attentional allocation upon reward and loss-associated nonsalient distractors are supported by distinct neural mechanisms: An EEG study.
    Jiang Y; Cui C; Liu M; Zhang X
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jul; 157():107879. PubMed ID: 33957194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Value-modulated attentional capture is augmented by win-related sensory cues.
    Pearson D; Piao M; Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jan; 77(1):133-143. PubMed ID: 36803153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motivated suppression of value- and threat-modulated attentional capture.
    Grégoire L; Britton MK; Anderson BA
    Emotion; 2022 Jun; 22(4):780-794. PubMed ID: 32628035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search.
    Le Pelley ME; Ung R; Mine C; Most SB; Watson P; Pearson D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1446-1459. PubMed ID: 35013993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimuli that signal the availability of reward break into attentional focus.
    Wang L; Li S; Zhou X; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2018 Mar; 144():20-28. PubMed ID: 29408161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection.
    MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reward expectation enhances reactive control of distraction by emotionally negative stimuli.
    Rong Y; Li Y; Müller HJ; Wei P
    Emotion; 2023 Aug; 23(5):1349-1359. PubMed ID: 36095173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reward breaks through the inhibitory region around attentional focus.
    Wang L; Duan Y; Theeuwes J; Zhou X
    J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25280985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.